Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
Thank you saaya. The funny thing is that even if it was run on the shader core (it's not) why is that a bad thing? I'm sure if AMD did that it would be all the rage and Nvidia's fixed function hardware would be old and backward.
it reminds me of the monolithic vs mcm talk between amd and intel...

Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
physix also was made with support from out side 3rd parties. IMO Physics has to mature still its not really ready to be used in large scale, Nvidia physix is a step who knows ATi's physics is the next one, one thing is for sure raw SP processing on ATi is hard to beat.
on one hand, nvidia at least tried, and failed...

on the other hand, id prefer no gpu physics over nvidia physix... think about it... another amd style physix would be a nightmare...
and then think of how great it would be if physix never would have existed! mhhh thats a nice thought...

Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
Do you have a better source? Atleast neilz has a good track record.
is that even the same neliz as here on xs?
either way, fastest nvidia card in 2010 is 295... come on... i find that really hard to believe... nvidia should be able to get at least some few dual fermi cards out before the end of 2010 and beat the 295 at least by a bit...
and a super limited edition 512core fermi at nice clocks should be able to beat a 295 at least by a few percentage points...