Page 50 of 109 FirstFirst ... 404748495051525360100 ... LastLast
Results 1,226 to 1,250 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

  1. #1226
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    cuda will solve everything lol damn so sad how nvidia became such a joke material after that mighty g80 arch

  2. #1227
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    Holy cow, have you guys seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpZXhR1ibj8

    It is the Hitler video and his reaction is to the bad news about Fermi. HAHA, man it is classic.
    What was the "wheelchair wheel" reference?

  3. #1228
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    These videos really never get old, although I do have to turn the sound off of course.
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  4. #1229
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by thatdude90210 View Post
    What was the "wheelchair wheel" reference?
    I dunno, I didn't get that one either. And in the thread i saw this link in at hardforum, they were all asking, "wheelchair wheels?"
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #1230
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    GTX 470 20-25% faster than GTX 285, GTX 480 equal to HD 5970?

    http://www.donanimhaber.com/GeForce_...ilir-18363.htm
    Translated

  6. #1231
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    close not equal

  7. #1232
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    480 is-going-to-be-512-sp!!!
    I dont think so. There are 99 reasons why not. And only reason why yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    it reminds me of the monolithic vs mcm talk between amd and intel...
    yup. The parallels are eerie. Except, back in R600 days, AMD was going monolithic (1 huge chip), for both CPU and graphics.

    Now, AMD graphics is always small chip strategy. And even CPU like Athlon X4 are aiming to be smaller.

    Simply, AMD changed. nVidia still hasn't.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dainas View Post
    Fallout 3 has lag/hitches because fricken nvidia, screwed up. With older 180~ drivers a GTX 285 runs it as smooth as butter regardless of how high your resolution. I've begun to foster a great hatred of nvidia, as before with ATI, due to the ever increasing neglect they have shown towards drivers. I cannot go back to the horror of constantly messing with CC/ingane sliders to ensure of AA is working though. Heres hoping fermi isnt another damn leafblower, let alone one just aimed at screwing intel's desk up.
    That is because BOTH nVidia and AMD "fix bugs" in games just before new product launch to "slow down" their old products, to make new products look better. You can even use it to make rebranded products appear faster

    SECRET OF GTX480/FERMI PERFORMANCE.
    Look at these graphcs comparing 4890 vs 5870. Similar clocks, but 2x more shader power:
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...hd5870_16.html
    But performance typically only 40-50% higher.

    And 5970 has about 4x shader power of 4890:
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...0_8.html#sect1
    But once again that translates into only 70-90% higher fps.

    Fermi has at best 512/240 = 2.1x more shader power.. probably a bit lower if less SP or lower clocks. Although they will definetly be faster than GTX285, and certainly close to 5870, I think comparisons to 5970 are wishful thinking (unless secretly those 512SP are really 1024SP -_-)

    Anybody hear of Amdahl;s Law? Diminishing returns?
    Some games, especially RTS, are so CPU bound they show very little gain. Some like L4D2 are not very demanding, and doesn't matter if you're getting 150fps or 200fps.

    The only games where 5870/5970 really make a difference are those where such a card makes the game playable: Crysis/Warhead, Stalker: COP, HAWX, Battleforge.

    So like I said so many times before, its "Crysis" syndrome. 90% of games that everyone can play on any mainstream card, and a few not so great games with "special" effects feature that makes them so slow, even ultra-high-end struggle. Bottom line, unless Fermi has some top secret features, its just a (late) replacement for 5870... ie doesnt change anything.
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 02-24-2010 at 05:15 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  8. #1233
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    Anyway i'm done with coments, ... launch is not to far away..
    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    GTX 480 will be 40-50% faster than 5870. And would you know vhy...
    Because Nvidia drivers for DX11 would have more performance in DX11&DX10 games...
    You all know that DX11 for 5770(an example) lowered the performance..
    I mean 5770 shoud have about same performance( in DX 10 games) with 4890(same specifications) , but it don't have it.
    5830>=4890.
    So GTX 480 will beat 5870 with the "power of drivers to"..
    You've sure posted a lot for someone who was done commenting, lol

  9. #1234
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    SECRET OF GTX480/FERMI PERFORMANCE.
    Look at these graphcs comparing 4890 vs 5870. Similar clocks, but 2x more shader power:
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...hd5870_16.html
    But performance typically only 40-50% higher.

    ...

    Fermi has at best 512/240 = 2.1x more shader power.. probably a bit lower if less SP or lower clocks.
    Invalid comparison. The reason ATI is getting diminishing returns from doubling the SPs is because their 5-way SPs are optimized for independent instructions, which can't be continuously generated for an unlimited number of SPs. RV870 can only execute 320 dependent instructions, which is where the biggest chunk of performance on the SPs comes from because performance increases in a more linear manner with an increasing ability to execute dependent instructions.

    Each of GF100s SPs can execute a dependent instruction, for a total of 512.

  10. #1235
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    480 is-going-to-be-512-sp!!!
    Even if it's not it won't be the end of the world. A 480 shader / 60 tmu part should still hold its own well enough. It all comes down to clocks.

  11. #1236
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    fermi is an architecture, not a product. i dont see how geforce 400 series is a failure if it hast launched yet. there are several elements of a failure that are missing. being late is the only one so far.
    Haha, that argument is such a joke. You take this crap way too seriously. Fermi is late, I don't care what you call it, a uARCH, a product whatever. The uARCH is what the product is based off of right? We were told it'd be out in 09, its not. That's my point. You are way too literal and it seems the fanboy in you will pick apart anything anyone says just to find something to argue with. I guess r600 wasn't late either..It wasn't a product, just a uARCH. And Tukwilla? Nah, not 3 years late. It was never a product, just a uARCH! '

    I would sure like to make new uARCHs for a living. That way I can just keep working on it indefinitely and not have worry about it ever being late. uARCHs are immune from time, they can't be late or early! They aren't products after all~

    Whether info is official or not, something is obviously wrong. Deny it all you want, have fun in whatever world you're living in. I live in reality.


    Quote Originally Posted by ElSel10 View Post
    Speak for yourself.
    Point to me where I am blatently insulting other people, putting them down and trying to start stuff? ??!?!
    Last edited by Tenknics; 02-24-2010 at 06:54 PM.
    Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160

  12. #1237
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenknics View Post
    Haha, that argument is such a joke. You take this crap way too seriously. Fermi is late, I don't care what you call it, a uARCH, a product whatever. The uARCH is what the product is based off of right? We were told it'd be out in 09, its not. That's my point. You are way too literal and it seems the fanboy in you will pick apart anything anyone says just to find something to argue with.
    why do you have such an aggressive response to my argument? quit being so emotional. i'm not picking at your words, you just post ridiculous things.

    I guess r600 wasn't late either..It wasn't a product, just a uARCH. And Tukwilla? Nah, not 3 years late. It was never a product, just a uARCH! '
    exactly. its not a hard concept to grasp. the delays were process related too. they put too much on their plate but it payed off in the end. tukwila is another story altogether.
    I would sure like to make new uARCHs for a living. That way I can just keep working on it indefinitely and not have worry about it ever being late. uARCHs are immune from time, they can't be late or early! They aren't products after all~
    you are very funny but i dont know how you could have reached this conclusion based on my statement. fermi taped out 6 months ago so the architecture is finished. they had 3 metal spins which were for debugging.
    Whether info is official or not, something is obviously wrong. Deny it all you want, have fun in whatever world you're living in. I live in reality.
    that something would be yields. i thought that was well known by now.

    Point to me where I am blatently insulting other people, putting them down and trying to start stuff? ??!?!
    look up.^^

  13. #1238
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    GTX 470 20-25% faster than GTX 285, GTX 480 equal to HD 5970?

    http://www.donanimhaber.com/GeForce_...ilir-18363.htm
    Translated
    If that's true, will we see a 512 SP high clocked GTX 480 vs 384 SP decent clocked/416 SP low clocked GTX 470 ? The performance differential is too wide.

  14. #1239
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed_X View Post
    OMG, GTX 480 has 512SP, 1,5GB RAM and performs extremely well, this all thread are for laungh, and we are laughing!
    I hope this is true and it is what I have been suspecting all along.

  15. #1240
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    ok some serious info 470 is faster like 25 percent from gtx 285 and gtx 480 is close to 5970 in both performance and power usage
    that would make the 470 faster than a 5850 and about as fast if not faster than a 5870, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by 96redformula7 View Post
    I swear that video with different captions never gets old
    yeah, i liked the part when hitler asks everybody except for the top guys to leave the room, and they dubbed it : everybody who owns or has owned an ati card, leave the room... and almost everybody leaves

    Quote Originally Posted by Zed_X View Post
    OMG, GTX 480 has 512SP, 1,5GB RAM and performs extremely well, this all thread are for laungh, and we are laughing!
    i wonder if youll still laugh when we hear about the final price and when you try to actually buy one though heheh

    about fermi being late... i dont think that necessarily means fail...
    how long did G80 last? it could have launched 6 months later and still would have been a kick4ss gpu and dominated the market...

    no news about GF104?

  16. #1241
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Zed_X View Post
    OMG, GTX 480 has 512SP, 1,5GB RAM and performs extremely well, this all thread are for laungh, and we are laughing!
    I hope you aren't basing that off PR slides!

  17. #1242
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hollywierd, CA
    Posts
    1,284
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    I hope you aren't basing that off PR slides!
    he's been right before...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    I am an artist (EDM producer/DJ), pls check out mah stuff.

  18. #1243
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    I am 99% sure GTX480 only has 15 TPC.

  19. #1244
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by 570091D View Post
    he's been right before...
    He has also been wrong...
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  20. #1245
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    well, it doesnt really matter what nvidia calls them, but there probably will be 16TPC 512core cards...
    im pretty sure they will come in very limited numbers though...

    probably less than 280s when nvidia launched gt200, and back then the whole launch allocation for one month for taiwan was only 3 dozen cards...
    sure, taiwan isnt a big country, but they were sold out within a day or two

  21. #1246
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    He has also been wrong...
    His post history doesn't indicate that. At least here at XS. What has he been wrong about so far? In any case there should be leaks galore within a week or two.

  22. #1247
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    What about B1 revision pals ? Is it the retail version ?

    And GF104 has been taped out or no ?

    And thanks OTH for the donanimhaber.com's link, hope that's true

  23. #1248
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    edit: I have some very reliable source, saying that GTX 480 will be 480 sp's and above 700MHz in clockspeed
    Last edited by annihilat0r; 02-25-2010 at 03:09 AM.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  24. #1249
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    GTX 470 will have 1280MB memory, and GTX 480 1536MB memory.
    This due the memory buses(like G80 series) 320bytes(640-1280) and 384bytes(768-1536)...
    You've sure posted a lot for someone who was done commenting, lol
    Comments about launch...Even so i don't "speak" very much like others..
    Last edited by xdan; 02-25-2010 at 03:08 AM.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  25. #1250
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    edit: I have some very reliable source, saying that GTX 480 will be 480 sp's and above 700MHz in clockspeed
    I think it's better if you don't post at all.
    --->

    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    480 is-going-to-be-512-sp!!!

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

Page 50 of 109 FirstFirst ... 404748495051525360100 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •