cuda will solve everything lol damn so sad how nvidia became such a joke material after that mighty g80 arch
cuda will solve everything lol damn so sad how nvidia became such a joke material after that mighty g80 arch
These videos really never get old, although I do have to turn the sound off of course.
Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks
GTX 470 20-25% faster than GTX 285, GTX 480 equal to HD 5970?
http://www.donanimhaber.com/GeForce_...ilir-18363.htm
Translated
close not equal
I dont think so. There are 99 reasons why not. And only reason why yes.
yup. The parallels are eerie. Except, back in R600 days, AMD was going monolithic (1 huge chip), for both CPU and graphics.
Now, AMD graphics is always small chip strategy. And even CPU like Athlon X4 are aiming to be smaller.
Simply, AMD changed. nVidia still hasn't.
That is because BOTH nVidia and AMD "fix bugs" in games just before new product launch to "slow down" their old products, to make new products look better. You can even use it to make rebranded products appear faster
SECRET OF GTX480/FERMI PERFORMANCE.
Look at these graphcs comparing 4890 vs 5870. Similar clocks, but 2x more shader power:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...hd5870_16.html
But performance typically only 40-50% higher.
And 5970 has about 4x shader power of 4890:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...0_8.html#sect1
But once again that translates into only 70-90% higher fps.
Fermi has at best 512/240 = 2.1x more shader power.. probably a bit lower if less SP or lower clocks. Although they will definetly be faster than GTX285, and certainly close to 5870, I think comparisons to 5970 are wishful thinking (unless secretly those 512SP are really 1024SP -_-)
Anybody hear of Amdahl;s Law? Diminishing returns?
Some games, especially RTS, are so CPU bound they show very little gain. Some like L4D2 are not very demanding, and doesn't matter if you're getting 150fps or 200fps.
The only games where 5870/5970 really make a difference are those where such a card makes the game playable: Crysis/Warhead, Stalker: COP, HAWX, Battleforge.
So like I said so many times before, its "Crysis" syndrome. 90% of games that everyone can play on any mainstream card, and a few not so great games with "special" effects feature that makes them so slow, even ultra-high-end struggle. Bottom line, unless Fermi has some top secret features, its just a (late) replacement for 5870... ie doesnt change anything.
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 02-24-2010 at 05:15 PM.
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
Invalid comparison. The reason ATI is getting diminishing returns from doubling the SPs is because their 5-way SPs are optimized for independent instructions, which can't be continuously generated for an unlimited number of SPs. RV870 can only execute 320 dependent instructions, which is where the biggest chunk of performance on the SPs comes from because performance increases in a more linear manner with an increasing ability to execute dependent instructions.
Each of GF100s SPs can execute a dependent instruction, for a total of 512.
Haha, that argument is such a joke. You take this crap way too seriously. Fermi is late, I don't care what you call it, a uARCH, a product whatever. The uARCH is what the product is based off of right? We were told it'd be out in 09, its not. That's my point. You are way too literal and it seems the fanboy in you will pick apart anything anyone says just to find something to argue with. I guess r600 wasn't late either..It wasn't a product, just a uARCH. And Tukwilla? Nah, not 3 years late. It was never a product, just a uARCH! '
I would sure like to make new uARCHs for a living. That way I can just keep working on it indefinitely and not have worry about it ever being late. uARCHs are immune from time, they can't be late or early! They aren't products after all~
Whether info is official or not, something is obviously wrong. Deny it all you want, have fun in whatever world you're living in. I live in reality.
Point to me where I am blatently insulting other people, putting them down and trying to start stuff? ??!?!
Last edited by Tenknics; 02-24-2010 at 06:54 PM.
Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160
why do you have such an aggressive response to my argument? quit being so emotional. i'm not picking at your words, you just post ridiculous things.
exactly. its not a hard concept to grasp. the delays were process related too. they put too much on their plate but it payed off in the end. tukwila is another story altogether.I guess r600 wasn't late either..It wasn't a product, just a uARCH. And Tukwilla? Nah, not 3 years late. It was never a product, just a uARCH! '
you are very funny but i dont know how you could have reached this conclusion based on my statement. fermi taped out 6 months ago so the architecture is finished. they had 3 metal spins which were for debugging.I would sure like to make new uARCHs for a living. That way I can just keep working on it indefinitely and not have worry about it ever being late. uARCHs are immune from time, they can't be late or early! They aren't products after all~![]()
that something would be yields. i thought that was well known by now.Whether info is official or not, something is obviously wrong. Deny it all you want, have fun in whatever world you're living in. I live in reality.
look up.^^Point to me where I am blatently insulting other people, putting them down and trying to start stuff? ??!?!![]()
that would make the 470 faster than a 5850 and about as fast if not faster than a 5870, right?
yeah, i liked the part when hitler asks everybody except for the top guys to leave the room, and they dubbed it : everybody who owns or has owned an ati card, leave the room... and almost everybody leaves
i wonder if youll still laugh when we hear about the final price and when you try to actually buy one though heheh
about fermi being late... i dont think that necessarily means fail...
how long did G80 last? it could have launched 6 months later and still would have been a kick4ss gpu and dominated the market...
no news about GF104?![]()
I am 99% sure GTX480 only has 15 TPC.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
well, it doesnt really matter what nvidia calls them, but there probably will be 16TPC 512core cards...
im pretty sure they will come in very limited numbers though...
probably less than 280s when nvidia launched gt200, and back then the whole launch allocation for one month for taiwan was only 3 dozen cards...
sure, taiwan isnt a big country, but they were sold out within a day or two![]()
What about B1 revision pals ? Is it the retail version ?
And GF104 has been taped out or no ?
And thanks OTH for the donanimhaber.com's link, hope that's true![]()
edit: I have some very reliable source, saying that GTX 480 will be 480 sp's and above 700MHz in clockspeed
Last edited by annihilat0r; 02-25-2010 at 03:09 AM.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
GTX 470 will have 1280MB memory, and GTX 480 1536MB memory.
This due the memory buses(like G80 series) 320bytes(640-1280) and 384bytes(768-1536)...
Comments about launch...Even so i don't "speak" very much like others..You've sure posted a lot for someone who was done commenting, lol
Last edited by xdan; 02-25-2010 at 03:08 AM.
i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
Asrock P67 PRO3![]()
P55 PRO & i5 750
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
239 BCKL validation on cold air
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
Almost 5hgz , air.
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
Bookmarks