Excuse me for believing someone who has had a decent track record on information on Fermi. If the same information was written about in a more traditional manner and the author's name wasn't Charlie, you'd be all over it. He's been pretty right thus far about Fermi, its delays and problems. Regardless of his slant. I don't believe everything he writes like you seem to claim. I just know since day one Fermi wasn't going to come out in 2009 like so many on this forum claim, and rather than saying "its going to be late because its bad" he gave some pretty detailed and specific evidence. I wouldn't call them facts because no one knows for sure. The point is, I don't have any bias like you. I dont think everything he writes is automatically false like you. If it makes sense, then I'm more inclined to believe it. I'd rather not get caught up in this pointless argument. As far as tessellation, the reasons given make sense.