I find it interesting that this user report of AC350 vs HK3.0 is showing a similar trend to my own test results. I also find it interesting that your stance then is to try to discredit this report by laughing, just like your stance in an earlier post (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...5&postcount=15) about the GTZ was to discredit my own test results by stating that people “liked” my review ROTFL
As to mounting the AC350 better than the GTZ, give me a break. No spring tension limiter?
Performance wise, there are 3 top blocks on the market today, the HK, the GTZ and the Supreme. From their respective C/W vs flow rate curves (see Hemeslaugh excellent work on these curves), we can see that the GTZ tends to favor high flow rates (US market), whereas the other two blocks favor low flow rates (European market).
Which one to choose boils down to setup type, cosmetics, price, and ease of use; and I will add that in the grand scheme of things even setup type remains arguable since the differences are so minimal that they do not affect operating conditions (O/C). So we are left with cosmetics, price and convenience. Cosmetics are subjective, and cannot be argued; price is objective and depends on the user wallet; ease of use is objective and this is the element we focused on to benefit the vast majority of users.





Reply With Quote

Bookmarks