Page 11 of 185 FirstFirst ... 8910111213142161111 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 4616

Thread: Gigabyte EX58-UD5/Extreme Discussion Thread

  1. #251
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    608
    HI
    NAMEGT i7 920 TEST
    GA-X58 EX




    3.6G


    4G


    4.5G


    4.57G


    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457408

  2. #252
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by namegt View Post
    HI
    NAMEGT i7 920 TEST
    GA-X58 EX
    Nice.. Can you share your bios settings that allowed you to hit 214 and 218 BCLK please?

  3. #253
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    608
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukee View Post
    Nice.. Can you share your bios settings that allowed you to hit 214 and 218 BCLK please?

    214 BCLK / 218

    Multi: x20
    BCLK:214 / 218
    Performance : Standard/Turbo
    Loadline : Enable
    QPI/VTT : 1.35v / 1.4v
    Vdim : 1.64v
    Vcore : 1.525v
    cpu pll 1.84
    qpi pll 1.18
    ioh core 1.120
    ich 1/0 1.58
    ich core 1.140

  4. #254
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by namegt View Post
    214 BCLK / 218

    Multi: x20
    BCLK:214 / 218
    Performance : Standard/Turbo
    Loadline : Enable
    QPI/VTT : 1.35v / 1.4v
    Vdim : 1.64v
    Vcore : 1.525v
    cpu pll 1.84
    qpi pll 1.18
    ioh core 1.120
    ich 1/0 1.58
    ich core 1.140
    3Dmark scores?

  5. #255
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by namegt View Post
    214 BCLK / 218

    Multi: x20
    BCLK:214 / 218
    Performance : Standard/Turbo
    Loadline : Enable
    QPI/VTT : 1.35v / 1.4v
    Vdim : 1.64v
    Vcore : 1.525v
    cpu pll 1.84
    qpi pll 1.18
    ioh core 1.120
    ich 1/0 1.58
    ich core 1.140
    Thanks nameGT
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  6. #256
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    824
    Quote Originally Posted by Xello View Post
    Can you explain how? Even with a single slot back plate how do you get round the big bit of metal there that would block installation?

    Think i might end up waiting for this dual slot GTX200 card i keep hearing about..
    My video cards are water cooled.
    Please note: I am not here to provide any kind of official NCIX support on these forums.

    For faster (and official) service please contact me at Linus@ncix.com, or please contact our customer care team at wvvw.NCIX.com (Canada) or wvvw.NCIXUS.com (America)

    Heatware: http://heatware.com/eval.php?id=25647

  7. #257
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    Just tried F4K, broke my OC, couldnt get anything stable, for me that bios sucked, went back to F3 and everything is ok again.

  8. #258
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,609
    Bclock test F4J 220 no problem

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=458106

    Last edited by hiwa; 12-07-2008 at 02:33 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse View Post
    i think you are asking the wrong person about safety limits, but

  9. #259
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    563
    Quote Originally Posted by roller11 View Post
    Has anyone gotten Vista sleep mode to work in their mobo? It's broken in my new rig, worked perfectly in my old C2D machine.
    x58 ud5, vista 64 home, S3 suspend type enabled in bios.
    Did you try BIOS F4K? Anyone else having having suspend issues with latest beta?

  10. #260
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,442
    Below pic is what is apparently hidden in GB bios, this pic from another poster is bios of intel x58 board. I think this explains why F3 bios is stable with turbo enabled with a lower Vcore than all F4beta bioses.

    F3 bios apparently sets 1-core and 2-core ratio limit of 21 for i920 and 23 for i940, ie allows turbo for 1 and 2 cores loads. While 3 and 4 core ratio limits are stock or 20 i920 and 22 i940. All F4betas have 1-4 core ratio limit all set at turbo mode 21 for i920 and 23 for i940. For that reason to be stable in F4 beta bioses, you have to turn turbo off or use significantly more vcore than what you need for stable in F3. It may also be necessary to adjust TDP override as well.

    I wonder if enough of us email GB, would they make this option accessible to us.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	what_GB_bios_needs.jpg 
Views:	2638 
Size:	31.6 KB 
ID:	90329  

  11. #261
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    131
    Super Pi 1Mb - 4218Mhz - FSB a "222x19" - V.core 1.23v....



    Validation:

    CPU-Z Validator 3.0


  12. #262
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by roller11 View Post
    Has anyone gotten Vista sleep mode to work in their mobo? It's broken in my new rig, worked perfectly in my old C2D machine.
    x58 ud5, vista 64 home, S3 suspend type enabled in bios.
    I have not been able to do S3 suspend with the UD5 with BIOS F3. System turn on but not wake up from S3. F4i seems to have fixed the problem but F4K seems to not entering S3 correctly again....
    System:
    Gigabyte EX58-UD5 Rev 1.0 (F3)
    Intel Core i7 965EE
    12G ADATA DDR3-1333 @ 1333 JEDEC 1.5V
    OCZ Vertex 250G - ICH10R (OS)
    Corsair S128 X 2 RAID 0 (Data)
    WD 1002FALS (Caviar Black)
    ATI 4870X2
    Creative Titanium Pro X-Fi PCIe
    LG GCW-H20L
    Corsair HX1000W
    Lian-Li V1000Z
    Vista Ultimate x64 SP1

  13. #263
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    Just tried F4K, broke my OC, couldnt get anything stable, for me that bios sucked, went back to F3 and everything is ok again.


    i disagree


    4Ghz @ 1.27v
    QPi/VTT : 1.235v
    Uncore : x16
    Ram : x8
    HT Enable


    >> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...32#post3481232



    Last edited by mascaras; 12-07-2008 at 08:50 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  14. #264
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by mascaras View Post
    i disagree


    4Ghz @ 1.27v
    QPi/VTT : 1.235v
    Uncore : x16
    Ram : x8
    HT Enable

    How stable are those settings?
    For 4Ghz I need at least 1.40625V for IntelBurnTest with maximum stress
    Silverstone TJ-10
    Seasonic M12 700W Modular
    Gigabyte EX58-Extreme
    Core i7 940 @ 40Ghz with TRUE
    3x 2GB Mushkin DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24
    2x Leadtek 9800GTX in SLI
    Dell 22" LCD display

  15. #265
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270
    I just don't understand. it may just be me, but for me to get over 205, I need to raise Qpi/vtt to over 1.6V!!!

    everyone else that is running 210+ is under 1.4V

    My other settings are pretty similar.

    Do I just have a bad board?

  16. #266
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukee View Post
    I just don't understand. it may just be me, but for me to get over 205, I need to raise Qpi/vtt to over 1.6V!!!

    everyone else that is running 210+ is under 1.4V

    My other settings are pretty similar.

    Do I just have a bad board?

    Max BCLK i tested was 220 but i dont tested the stability (1.235v QPI/VTT)

    http://img381.imageshack.us/img381/7872/220tj8.jpg



    Quote Originally Posted by fly_ebos View Post
    How stable are those settings?
    For 4Ghz I need at least 1.40625V for IntelBurnTest with maximum stress


    i only run about 10 minuts prime small & Blend , then i stop the test!

    but with te previous F3 bios for 4Ghz i needed to use 200x20 @ 1.344v and 3.8ghz @ 1.27v (200x19)

    But now the new F4K bios Turbo Option always set multi x21 (not only in single app like F3 bios ) , and now i can run 4Ghz (191x21 @ Turbo) with 1.27v

    and for 3.8Ghz with F4K bios i only need 1.20v (200x19)

    http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9391/3800120vev4.jpg



    Try the new F4 bios (F4K for UD5 & F4J for Extreme) , now you can use Turbo Option always with Multi x21

    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 12-07-2008 at 10:53 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  17. #267
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by mascaras View Post
    Max BCLK i tested was 220 but i dont tested the stability (1.235v QPI/VTT)
    I'm not testing stability either. In fact, I haven't been able to get a stable 4.0+ setup yet using Prime95.

    I'm just trying to boot up into windows at 210+. Like i mentioned, it required a ridiculous amount of QTi/VTT voltage.

    Maybe I just have a bad board. I'm thinking of possibly getting another one.

    Any recommendations? Maybe i just got unlucky with the chip.

  18. #268
    The PhotoCHOPer
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    961
    Hey all,

    Keeping a good eye on this thread now

    --

    One thing I did notice (from the picture below) - If you're planning on using the Ultra 120, and "tall" ram you'll need to put the fan on the other side as it does overlap slot 1. There is enough room for regular ram, but Viper & Dominator isn't going to fit.



    Last edited by Silver Bullet; 12-07-2008 at 12:29 PM.
    Silver Bullet VII

    Corsair 750D | Corsair AX 850W | Core i7 2600K | Thermalright Venomous X | Asus Maximus IV Extreme B3
    eVGA GTX680 SLI | Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB | Intel 530 240GB | 2 x WD RED 3TB in RAID 1 | LG BluRay | 3 x 2413WFP

  19. #269
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lost and Confused in the City of Rain
    Posts
    293
    Hi guys. I have a x58 UD5 and Core I7 965. I am running stock. This is my first quad core proc and I am having some trouble with it.

    When I boot into windows and look at it with CPU-ID 1.49, one one processor and 2 threads show. Does anyone know what is up with my comp?

  20. #270
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    yeah, that usually happens when you dont use a fresh install. What does it show in device manager.
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  21. #271
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lost and Confused in the City of Rain
    Posts
    293
    Yes, my computer isn't using a fresh install. I carried over my install until I decide with SSD drive I want.

    When I go into my device manager, I get "Intel Core I7 CPU 965 @ 3.2GHz" 8 times.

  22. #272
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    just needs a fresh install then, not sure if there is a repair setting or something.
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  23. #273
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    608
    i7 920 & EX58-EX TEST PC

    CPU i7 920 [3838B079]
    M/B EX58-EX [F4I]
    RAM samsung DDR3-10600 1x3 [0845]
    VGA x700
    POWER Topower Octopus 850W
    Cooler WATER

    SETING

    Multi: x19
    BCLK:211
    Performance : Standard/Turbo OFF
    Loadline : Enable
    QPI/VTT : 1.25v
    Vdim : 1.64v
    Vcore : 1.29v
    cpu pll 1.84
    qpi pll 1.18
    ioh core 1.120
    ich 1/0 1.58
    ich core 1.140














    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457408
    Last edited by namegt; 12-08-2008 at 02:52 AM.

  24. #274
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    674
    Is there any big difference between UD5 and Extreme ? Do u think i can reach BCLK 210+ with a UD5 for example ?
    [SIGPIC]http://techsweden.org[/SIGPIC]
    Gigabyte Z87X-OC, Haswell 4770K, 8GB Team Group 2666mhz, Asus HD7970

  25. #275
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    has anyone tried benchmarking their RAM past 2GHz
    i cant seem to reach high MHz but this RAM is capable

    everything else pretty much rocks with this board
    its pretty efficienct, OCs like a mofo and performance is good, stable and all

    btw i am yet to experience these cold boot startup problems that some were mentioning

    got a link in the sig from testing notes etc
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



Page 11 of 185 FirstFirst ... 8910111213142161111 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •