Page 25 of 77 FirstFirst ... 15222324252627283575 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 625 of 1917

Thread: GeForce 9900 GTX & GTS Slated For July Launch

  1. #601
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Kayin View Post
    Check this pic out from my contact at nVidia...

    280s ready to ship...


    I've seen that pic somewhere... years ago... likely in a factory tour article.
    Someone's pulling your leg.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  2. #602
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Tim View Post
    If you would actually understand HOW much is going on in Crysis, then you understand why it doesn't run flatout on todays hardware.

    Crysis does scale well with different hardware, just wait.

    I really hope you are right, but a quad at 4ghz and 8800GTS 512 in SLI gave me some very jerky moments... so I had to cut down on the res and gfx detail... any game to me that doesn't run well and needs hardware that will be released in the future (what 6 months after the game's release) to be sort of playable with decent IQ... is a major bummer to me... Crysis has pushed peeps to upgrade and yet till now it's not really fluid on high detail... on an X2 card it's way better but how many have bought those, the gamers are usually looking for hardware in a lower price segment...and you think these guys will upgrade again in June...

    I just want fluid gameplay in an FPS...at all times... surely with decent hardware...

    But to each his own opinion, I hope these babies ( or the ones from the red team) are worth every dime like the 8800GTX was to me...

    And that stack of naked cards has been indeed seen before, maybe it was another range of cards but I've seen something sortlike before ,though not with the ninja
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  3. #603
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    I really hope you are right, but a quad at 4ghz and 8800GTS 512 in SLI gave me some very jerky moments... so I had to cut down on the res and gfx detail... any game to me that doesn't run well and needs hardware that will be released in the future (what 6 months after the game's release) to be sort of playable with decent IQ... is a major bummer to me... Crysis has pushed peeps to upgrade and yet till now it's not really fluid on high detail... on an X2 card it's way better but how many have bought those, the gamers are usually looking for hardware in a lower price segment...and you think these guys will upgrade again in June...

    I just want fluid gameplay in an FPS...at all times... surely with decent hardware...
    Have you tried to play the game using XP and tweaked cvars? I don't think so

    I can play Crysis fairly decently at 1280x960, Ultra High with my sign rig (gfx @ 760/1900/1800 core/shader/mem).

    I think with some tweaking your system would run Crysis really nice...
    Are we there yet?

  4. #604
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Luka_Aveiro View Post
    Have you tried to play the game using XP and tweaked cvars? I don't think so

    I can play Crysis fairly decently at 1280x960, Ultra High with my sign rig (gfx @ 760/1900/1800 core/shader/mem).

    I think with some tweaking your system would run Crysis really nice...
    Nope no tweaked Cvars, just ran it out of the box...at 1280 x 1024 (my native TFT res)... pm me a link plz want to see what gives...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  5. #605
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    I really hope you are right, but a quad at 4ghz and 8800GTS 512 in SLI gave me some very jerky moments... so I had to cut down on the res and gfx detail... any game to me that doesn't run well and needs hardware that will be released in the future (what 6 months after the game's release) to be sort of playable with decent IQ... is a major bummer to me... Crysis has pushed peeps to upgrade and yet till now it's not really fluid on high detail... on an X2 card it's way better but how many have bought those, the gamers are usually looking for hardware in a lower price segment...and you think these guys will upgrade again in June...

    I just want fluid gameplay in an FPS...at all times... surely with decent hardware...
    The game does run well, but not at it's maximum, note that they have the ability as well to patch the game to Ultra settings in future, and said by Yerli Cevat. Even with 8800GTX SLI I had to turn down settings to high and very high. This game has been fully optimized for the G80 architecture, they had the 8800GTX looong before it was announced.

    I mean, they could have named the medium settings high, then everyone would be able to run it, but instead they wanted to future proof the engine, which is a great idea really.

    Farcry did the same thing, and that was a benchmark for literally years. Scaled very very well, and still looks great up to this day.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

  6. #606
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    168
    Tweaking can be crucial in any game in order to get the performance and graphics your computer deserves.

  7. #607
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410

    Next-gen NVIDIA GeForce Specs Unveiled, Part 2


    Although it's a bit risky to post information taken from unknown for me sources, not to mention that the site is German, it's worth trying. The guys over at Gamezoom (Google translated) reported yesterday that during NVIDIA's Editors Day, the same place where the F@H project for NVIDIA cards and the buyout of RayScale were announced, NVIDIA has also unveiled the final specs for its soon to be released GT200 cards. This information comes to complement our previous Next-gen NVIDIA GeForce Specs Unveiled story:
    • GeForce GTX 280 will feature 602MHz/1296MHz/1107MHz core/shader/memory clocks, 240 stream processors, 512-bit memory interface, and GDDR3 memory as already mentioned.
    • GeForce GTX 260 will come with 576MHz/999MHz/896MHz reference clock speeds, 192 steam processors, 448-bit memory interface and GDDR3 memory

    The prices are 449 U.S. dollars for the GTX 260 and more than 600$ for the GeForce 280 GTX. That's all for now.

    Gamezoom

    http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...31&postcount=1
    regards

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  8. #608
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Well I predicted $450 for 260 and 550 ~ $600 for 280 so not that far away... I can't understand why 280 would be above $600 tho if 260 is priced $450, sounds like a too huge gap. $600 I can still accept but say ~ $650 would start being too much at least just looking at the specs and trying to translate it into some perf difference. Guess being top of the hill just wants that much price bump eh or the retail price will actually be slightly lower (except the initial price gouging)?
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 05-26-2008 at 09:32 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  9. #609
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    464
    if it's 600 then with the initial price gouging and if sells out fast or low stock etailers well jack it to 800+

  10. #610
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    168
    In Sweden price gouging is non existent. Hope the competetion from the red team will be substantial this round, so that the MSRP on the 280 can go down to as low as 500 USD (this would be optimum, yeah). But that is probably far too optimistic.

  11. #611
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Just joking but I bet NVIDIA's doing an internal poll with following options:

    1. $550 - Aggressive

    2. $600 - Reasonable

    3. $650 - NVIDIA price-gauge™ (aka "The way it's meant to be priced")

    ...every NVIDIA rep votes #3. \o/
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  12. #612
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    80 ROPs ? Don't think so

    Edit: There's at least one error in the specifications sheet posted above ( not only the wrong units on the wrong line )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  13. #613
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Just joking but I bet NVIDIA's doing an internal poll with following options:

    1. $550 - Aggressive

    2. $600 - Reasonable

    3. $650 - NVIDIA price-gauge™ (aka "The way it's meant to be priced")

    ...every NVIDIA rep votes #3. \o/
    The 8800gtx was priced between 450 and 550 euros in europe at launch. If I can spend less than that for the gtx 280 I'm happy.

    SB Rig:
    | CPU: 2600K (L040B313T) | Cooling: H100 with 2x AP29 | Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3
    | RAM: 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 | Video: MSI gtx570 TF III
    | SSD: Crucial M4 128GB fw009 | HDDs: 2x GP 2TB, 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    | Audio: Cantatis Overture & Denon D7000 headphones | Case: Lian-Li T60 bench table
    | PSU: Seasonic X650 | Display: Samsung 2693HM 25,5"
    | OS: Windows7 Ultimate x64 SP1

    +Fanless Music Rig: | E5200 @0.9V

    +General surfing PC on sale | E8400 @4Ghz

  14. #614
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    616


    i dont realy understand everything there but the GT280 dont look that mach butter then then RV770XT

    any reviews out?

    do you guyz think that the GT280 will out preform 2x8800GTX in SLI by allot?

  15. #615
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Awww @ 260 having larger power draw than G80 Ultra!

    Time to find an AC unit on sale.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  16. #616
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    80 ROPs ? Don't think so

    Edit: There's at least one error in the specifications sheet posted above ( not only the wrong units on the wrong line )
    yeah ur right @ that chart here:
    http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=280553

    1st of all the ROP and TMU row should be switched for All nvidia cards

    2nd i am pretty sure that G80 8800GTX has 32 texture address units, and 64Texture Filtering Units, vs G92 8800GTS 512's 64 texture address units, 64 Texture Filtering Units

    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...8800_gtx_g80/6
    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...orce_8800_gt/2

    G92:
    16 stream processors, and share eight texture address units, eight texture filtering units and its own independent cache.
    G80:
    The clusters of sixteen streaming processors also share four texture address units and eight texture filtering units, making up a total of 32 texture address units and 64 texture filtering units in GeForce 8800 GTX.
    Last edited by Philip_J_Fry; 05-26-2008 at 11:14 AM.
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  17. #617
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by C.Ron7aldo View Post
    [IMG]
    i dont realy understand everything there but the GT280 dont look that mach butter then then RV770XT

    any reviews out?

    do you guyz think that the GT280 will out preform 2x8800GTX in SLI by allot?
    no doubt can't you see 512bit, 240 Stream processors, 933Glopps???
    1 bilion transistors, physcx ready and Cuda all in the same GPU


    SILVERSTONE TJ07 . ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME . INTEL C2D E8600@ Q822A435 . 6GB CELLSHOCK PC3 15000 . EVGA GTX 285 . WD VELOCIRAPTOR 300HLFS . WD AAKS 640GB ''RAID0 . CORSAIR HX 1000W . X-Fi FATAL1TY TITANIUM . LOGITECH WAVE . G9 LASER . Z5500 . DELL ULTRASHARP 2047WFP
    Aquaero VFD . Enzotech revA . Laing DDC 12v . Black Ice GTS-Lite 360 . Swiftech Mcres Micro . 3/8"
    By MrHydes®

    sales
    feedback Techzone

  18. #618
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by MrHydes View Post
    no doubt can't you see 512bit, 240 Stream processors, 933Glopps???
    1 bilion transistors, physcx ready and Cuda all in the same GPU
    Haha, stop it! You're teasing me.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  19. #619
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    heh yeah, but i think it will be gouged to like $700+ at launch, hopefully not though...

    i iwll prolly wait for 2/3months since no game will be coming out b4 Sept that cant be run on my G92 GTS SLI, and hopefully by that time the price will drop to around 600 USD
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  20. #620
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by MrHydes View Post
    no doubt can't you see 512bit, 240 Stream processors, 933Glopps???
    1 bilion transistors, physcx ready and Cuda all in the same GPU
    So... should i sell my GTX's before price drops more ?

  21. #621
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Hmmm the 770XT might make some noise, considering the power draw and price... Definitely between that card and the 260 for me.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  22. #622
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    80 ROPs ? Don't think so

    Edit: There's at least one error in the specifications sheet posted above ( not only the wrong units on the wrong line )
    correct chart:

    ~

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  23. #623
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    I'd say 649$
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  24. #624
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by C.Ron7aldo View Post


    i dont realy understand everything there but the GT280 dont look that mach butter then then RV770XT

    any reviews out?

    do you guyz think that the GT280 will out preform 2x8800GTX in SLI by allot?

    Yes it got twice as much as 9800GX2 in one of the 3dm vantage tests. (According to pczilla.net).

    Yes you don't seem to have a complete picture of how nvidia and ati architectures differ from each other.

  25. #625
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    332
    Sub 1 Tera flop

    Meh..

    If the Ultra can get 12 fps on Crysis @ 1920 by 1200, very high, 8 AA & AF on Q9650 @ 4.0ghz

    What will the Gtx280 get?

    23fps
    Last edited by y2kbos; 05-26-2008 at 11:52 AM.

Page 25 of 77 FirstFirst ... 15222324252627283575 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •