Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe View Post
Well , waiting for results still. Considering that this processor has been released and is in final production form it is a very poor showing up to now when it comes to actual results.

As a reference

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ghlight=conroe

That's a Conroe 4 months before release, not too many bugs or excuses there. Just goes to show how shoddy this release has been. How many more months can it be strung out that AMD will rule ... if you wait just a little bit longer. I am sure I have been hearing this from just before 65nm K8 and that ended in nothing but a massive let down with its poor overclocking and slow cache. Slow cache, hmm, that rings a bell with the K10 ...

As an avid overclocker since the Celeron 300A all I can say is

PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

Or can you not put up AMD merchants? Show us the scores.

Don't bother quoting me and arguing the other side, just put up some earth shaking benchmarks in the desktop space. If Conroe can get good scores 4 months before release then Phenom should be able to provide similar 2 months before if it is that good, or are AMD just dicking around still in the quicksand ?

This is another HD2900XT all over again.

Regards

Andy
and your point is?

why don't you let the folks who actually know something about the platform get a chance to get test the processors out besides hacking through a list of "Well, Intel did this..." stuff? we get it, you're not impressed....don't really care.

i have been upfront in claiming that B1 cores with their BIOS workaround DO cause performance deficits. BA will eliminate that, so, why don't you shut up and let me (and S7) get back to getting the platforms in line. you don't see me crapping in your threads, so....please, stop trying to attack people.

dave