you can see it in techpowerup review >> http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/
the demo for download I dont know
regards
you can see it in techpowerup review >> http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/
the demo for download I dont know
regards
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
Yeah I know it´s there for view, but someone have it in 1280x720
You can find it in emule, but only 1 source. Hope anybody knows where to download it
![]()
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
You can watch it here![]()
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT
Edit: whoops sorry, just posted...
Home PC: Intel i7 4770K @ 4.6ghz l Asus Maximus VI Hero l Corsair Dominator Plantinum 2400mhz (4x4GB) l Asus GTX 690 l Samsung 840 Pro 256gb l 2 x WD Black 1T storage drive l WD MyBook 500gb External l Samsung SH-S203N DVD l Creative X-Fi Titanium HD l Corsair AX1200 PSU l Planar SA2311W23 3D LCD Monitor l Corsair 800D Case l Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit l Sennheiser HD-590
Water Cooling Setup: Swiftech 320 Radiator (3 X Gentle Typhoons 1450rpm 3 x Gentle Typhoons 1850 rpm) l Swiftech Pump w/XSPC Res Top l Heatkiller 3.0 CPU Block l Heatkiller GPU-X GTX 690 "Hole Edition" Nickel l Heatkiller Geforce GTX 690 GPU Backplate l Koolance 140mm Radiator l Danger Den 1/2ID UV Green tubing l EK EKoolant UV Green Liquid
-Impossible is not a word
Man I want that the typical Realtime Demo's for download.
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
Driver Heaven's Review:
http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/...viewz/asus.php
Lots of vista benchmarks in there.
I wouldn't put stake in those numbers... read the review...
The IQ on the R600 is washed out and applying "filters" that shouldn't be there. Can we say "cheat"?
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/504/2/
Take a look yourself.
btw....
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/431/17/
NVidia's GTX wins in DX10, and the GTS ties the HD 2900XT in this title, and it's being optimized FOR THE HD 2900XT!
Ruby HD movie - http://www2.ati.com/multimedia/radeo...teout-V1.0.zip
Tesselation HD movie - http://www2.ati.com/multimedia/radeo...ation-V1.0.zip
Source: http://ati.amd.com/developer/demos/rhd2000.html
It is a MOV file BTW. The latest VideoLan plays it fine for me (VideoLan has built in codecs).
The Tesselation movie shows the mountains of the Ruby with and without tesselation. It is pretty amazing to see it, but as with TruForm it will require support from the developers. Let's hope that unlike TruForm this will get mass-support.
Last edited by Noobie; 05-14-2007 at 11:08 AM.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/?article_id=601352
The R600 really does lose in DX10....
![]()
umm where are the floating point benchmarks?
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
That review has so much credibility has the others have.
And about this:
Clear win in this also.
Both coincide in the Frames per second, so is easy to see that both are OK, the guru3d review is wrong acording with these two.
Image quality is ok in every review. It isn´t needed conspyiracy teory.....
Last edited by v_rr; 05-14-2007 at 11:22 AM.
Can be many things/drivers problems. Besides in the text is said that HD 2900 had munts of bugs runing the game.
This inicial DX_10 games will not show nothing special about DX_10 performance. It´s needed more titles and mores games and benchmarks to say something.
Take conclusions on that for ATI or for NVIDIA side is just being very Biased.....
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
![]()
![]()
VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
LOL in the other review because you dont like the numbers Its fAKE or they cheat
this pcgameshardwre.de numbers you like so its not FAKE and its the real thing (btw: if that its the real thing so 8800GTX not so good in DX10 because have the same FPS that 8800GTS , so ppl who want a card for future DX10 games should buy GTS and not GTX )
we already know you like 8800GTX and 8800GTX its better then X2900
you didnt realise yet that x2900 compete with 8800GTS 640mb not with 8800GTX???
Sapphire X2900XT in portugal = 375 euros
8800GTS 640mb in portgal = 399 euros
8800GTX in portugal = 550 euros
....
Last edited by mascaras; 05-14-2007 at 12:24 PM.
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
It means the card CAN do it, it just need some driver spanking![]()
I think its weird the 8.37.4.3 are slower, but at least we know the card CAN do it, so we have to wait for proper drivers!
G90 is delayed, so ATI should have time enough to tweak the drivers, and release a refresh in Q3.
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
What if the results are a freak accident due to some driver error, or incorrect/poor quality rendering? Surely there's a reason the "improvements" got pulled from the newer release?
I'm not trying to antagonise you, I really want this card to rock, but I think it's unrealistic to expect miracle boosts from newer drivers. Take the performance at face value today... any increase in the future will then be a pleasant surprise![]()
![]()
VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
Didn't call it fake. I stated that the article says the IQ is questionable on the HD 2900XT in that review. They have screenshots to show it, and gave the win to the 8800 anyway. I didn't call them out on it, legitreviews did. Infact, in the conclusion they specifically say they'd like an explanation from AMD or NVidia on what happened with the HD 2900's IQ.
Oh, I realize that's how it's "suppose" to be. In reality though, in the high-end, it's one companies top-tier against the others. People compared the x1800 against the 7800GTX 512mb even though the price difference was huge, no?we already know you like 8800GTX and 8800GTX its better then X2900
you didnt realise yet that x2900 compete with 8800GTS 640mb not with 8800GTX???
Sapphire X2900XT in portugal = 375 euros
8800GTS 640mb in portgal = 399 euros
8800GTX in portugal = 550 euros
....![]()
The price difference isn't nearly as large here... $100 difference on newegg between the cheapest HD 2900XT and 8800GTX.
Get this though, there's an $80 difference between the cheapest HD 2900xt and 8800GTS 640mb on newegg at the same time. $100 difference if you count the $20 MIR.
So, that makes the price gap identical from the 8800GTS 640 to the HD 2900XT, and going from the HD 2900XT to the 8800GTX...
Honestly though, I'm hoping AMD can get the R650 out the gates, and quick. With them not having the mid-range ready for atleast another month, and them really not being a clear decisive winner over the 8800GTS 640, they're going to be in a rather sizable amount of trouble if they don't pull a rabbit out of their hat quick. Even driverheaven said flat out that they "Cannot recommend this card.".
I had to laugh about your post heheh
Could be, who knows. If i would have the card, i would test it and tell you
In this matter i think it can be, because the drivers are much less mature then we used to get at a new launch. For example, dvd playback is horrible at the moment, twice as slow then a X1950XTX (cant find the review anymore :S).
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
eXceed TJ07 worklog/build
I hope you were laughing in a nice way
I too think there will definitely be large performance boosts in upcoming drivers, but there seems to be a lot of people out there who have the impression it will leave the GTS in the dirt and maybe even topple the GTX in more games. This clearly won't be the case; at least not at stock clocks!!
Suman
![]()
VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
AMD should ban crack from their driver team and start feading them meth coz right now it's just not good enough.
Bookmarks