Yes, and both, GF's process and the processor are f***ed up. That's why you should not do that, it doubles your risks ...
Well, to be fair, so far we only know about the process, a few day are left, just then we know 100% about the processor, too.
Also funny, the next step is probably neither a tick nor a tock. After BDv1@32nm there will be BDv1b@32nm. Well, officially it is called BDv2, however, there is obviously the possibility that BDv2 might just be a bug-fixed BDv1, hence BDv1b. In the last days/weeks I learned to always think about the worst case *g*
Short: To me, the appropriate comparison is not intel, it is nvidia. They got equally f***ed with Fermi and TSMC's 40nm process problems. Nowadays, GTX500 aka GTX400_1b runs nice. Let's hope that it will be the same for AMD and BDv1b ;-)
Bookmarks