If it was supposedly designed to deliver 30-50% more performance and if Mr Taylor stated this in the context of very parallel workloads (which is legitimate ) then we can say Bulldozer failed since it can't overall outperform Thuban by more than 20%,let alone 30% or now astronomical 50%. In order to achieve this ,the Bulldozer that John Taylor talked about must be the same one from
this slide (and no,this slide was not fake).
What happened in the meantime ? How from this 30-50% throughput machine we ended up with barely faster than Thuban?
Bookmarks