since the leaked prices are from SKU which will never exist and the benches show clearly that it is just a deneb afterall i suppose you are really that dissapointed that there is no enthousiast level performance .....
typical forum avarage joe desktop users: statements based on hypes-rumors and useless leaks.
Those who want to know more about new stuff should read more on the LIano launch right now, it is very near launch and there are leaks of retail SKU already i.s.o this B0 useless performance compare.
Last edited by chew*; 06-12-2011 at 09:19 AM.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Since it's not realistic that X8 Orochi is slower than Deneb,let alone Thuban,there is no reason to take these benchmarks seriously.If you look what that fool obr posted few days ago(yes,he breached NDA again),the scores are magically going up now. B1 Orochi he has now performs around 25-50% better than Thuban,instead of being slower.By the time we get to launch,I bet we will be seeing regular 40-50% across the board.This will make Zambezi a real enthusiast chip,in the ballpark of 990x.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
no really??? i thought that was what you were going for??? you have been told in this thread many times its a B0 stepping chip you had, but you keep on updating your ytube vids... i hope when you get a B1 or B2 stepping chip you will at least give it the same treatment.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
G0ldBr1ck: I am with you on this, its better knowing the performance even if its just B0, than not knowing anything.
God, those B0 results are really low ...
AMD seems to face problems ....
I'm closing this thread for the following reasons:
1. The video is clearly of an early ES chip, which is known not to be representative of retail speed
2. Every post past #1 has been speculation, fanboyism, or rehashing of the statement in #1
3. We don't want to get a rep as a forum that enjoys breaking NDA's with any vendors
Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.
Xtreme Network:
- Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
- Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
- Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
- Cisco 3502i Access Point
Bookmarks