Quote Originally Posted by Shadov View Post
Of course your opinion is 100% valid and legit and others are trolling? Great, Im glad you like the review since somehow your personal approach to others and standards seem to fit the overall picture that is being discussed here.

Anyway once again if someone tries to draw conclusions on e.g. power/performance ratios in a review based on biased titles then I still think that its not the best approach.

Merry Xmas to you also though I will skip the troll part.
So only optimised titles ( being it software or hardware wise) need to be included then ? Isn't that what biased is really about ?

My opinion : Include as many titles as possible. That provide the reviewer with a good constant output. The latter is what is essential for a reviewer. FYI I can bench F1 2010 10 times and get 10 different outcomes, sometimes miles apart... which makes it impossible to me to do a good judgement.

If I bench Lost planet 2 ( and I have) I get a pretty constant output, which is what I need to base conclusions upon... I don't care if it makes a card shine yes or no. If the card sucks monkey balls on a certain game, why not make it public ? Being it Lost Planet 2 or Hawx 2...

The 69xx series are a nice evolution , but nothing revolutionary. Not good enough to get the performance crown back... Admitting I was a bit dissapointed as the PR slides were telling me otherwise...

But it's a good step in the right direction. ATI will be back !!