Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
your post is so misinformative.

there is no preset function for yields v time or correctly defect density v time although generally they are logarithmic. ramp times accelerate with with moore's law in fact, even intel fell behind in this metric because there 32nm ramped as fast as their 45nm process. that's not all that great for a process that's only 70% denser.
The fact that GF is behind schedule with the process ramp by their very own admission is misinformation from my side ?
Interesting.

Secondly, there is no direct relation for yields and defects wrts to time. I don't know how you came up with that BS. The issue however are the deadlines set in the planning phase and the 32nm process failed to reach its intermediate deadlines.As for Intel's process it is obvious they did not target density. A conscious design choice doesn't make it great or not.


Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
Quoting Paul Demone from investor board,yikes :S. All I see there is he and terrace having back-patting match and dissecting GloFo's slides to find an inkling of "disaster",so that they can assure the rest how the process is screwed and the parts must be running hot(are you serious??).All this from a vague chart describing fmax without any usable information that could Paul in turn use to bad mouth it.But then again,Paul doesn't need a good reason does he?

PS Paul Demone post : The more I post,the lower the yields are!
You get the award for the least signal in your post and the most noise. GF by themselves admit there are issues and you spin it that it's Paul searching for a "inkling of a disaster". Paul interpreted the slide GF posted. You may like it or not, but at least try to come up with a shred of counter-evidence instead of turning it personal. But that's far more easier isn't it ?
I hope you'll wake up from your dellusion when in the next 3 months you'll see the 32nm products being officially delayed.

Quote Originally Posted by MrMojoZ View Post
You make things up, spin and pull out 6 year old quotes to attack AMD, but Intel is so awesome they can't possibly be doing anything wrong. You are a liar and offer nothing but negativity to these threads.
Having a bad day ? Try for once to challenge what I say instead of poking in the air and throwing false accusations.