Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post
Great.. Paul D. talking to terrace215 on an investor board.
Highly regarded professionalism in relentlessly spamming FUD.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards...ge_id=53966494


Regards, Hans
Nice to know you read Intel's invest boards. Btw, your reply also speaks volumes about your professionalism since you attack the speaker and not his arguments.

You claim you have experience in IC design. Do you agree or disagree with Paul's assesement, irrespective of where his preferences lie ? You can also decline if you believe your cannot make this judgement based on your experience. Let's keep the signal up and noise down. Stick to the facts.


Quote Originally Posted by Florinmocanu View Post
And you would be a professional right?

Well, professionalism means being impartial and not judging with your "love".

From your posts i don't see that, your always looking at the bad side of the things instead of looking at both sides of the story and just appreciating what the guys at AMD are working on.
Let's get the fact straight. AMD 32nm products are delayed because GF has problems with the 32nm process. ( hardly unexpected given their SOI+gate 1st aproach )
Informal posts a comment about slide 17 from the GF presentation regarding Freq distribution of the parts and considers it evidence of a good process since most parts hit N+2 frequency. ( N being the expected median ).
At first I believed that too, as amateur I thought : " What's the fuss with GF 32nm since it yields above target bins ? " Then I saw a post by Paul who has 30 years experience in IC, both analog and digital, holds several patents for memories,etc and he explained clearly things aren't right.
Distribution should follow a gaussian pattern with a bell centered around the median.
And then you and Hans come and snide about everything but the actual argument. Target the argument and not the messenger rings a bell ?