Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
OK, so let me get the gist of all of this whole thread down to two statements:

1. People are claiming Bulldozer will be slower than existing products because they are sharing resources in the processor and sharing is inherently worse.

2. People are claiming that even though Bulldozer has dedicated resources relative to the old architecture that shares them, this is worse.

OK, I got it now.
I'll make it short and easy to understand. Original quote:

Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
K10 has 3 ALUs and 3 AGUs. No matter how hard you and others try to downplay K10 execution resources, fact is, a K10 integer core has more resources than a BD integer core.
Which is 100% true, as K10 has more execution units. I don't see the words perfomance, shared or dedicated in this post. Then you say:

Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
No, you are wrong. Old architecture has shared resources, new architecture has dedicated resources.
Which is wrong, based on the above. I just pointed it out, but it seems it was a perfect excuse to ignore what the guy is actually saying (as you like to do) and repeat the same post you've been repeating how many times now?

I hope you properly get it now.