Quite interesting, by that definition he wasn't a trol lat all. He provided a logical argument/question with some facts (even when they where old), yet people had no real facts to counter his spesific question (ST IPC). The only facts that where available where increased ST performance and increased IPC (not specifed if its ST or not).
Anyway personally I prefer hard numbers, so all this theoretical mindgames arn't my cup of tea.






Reply With Quote

Bookmarks