Let me state this once more: you will always have some mount variation and your statement only implies an even less controlled test environment than I had previously thought. Whether you're properly using the included stock mounting hardware or a custom mounting configuration which applies a known and equal (or, as equal as possible) mounting load to all blocks being tested, you're still going to end up with some variation. You'd get this same information whether you asked me, Scott, Bill Adams, or Lee Garbutt. The best that any tester can do is take the mean of this data, whilst being sure to note the observed data range.
Moving right along, a CPU's internal temperature monitoring hardware is near worthless when it comes to controlled testing. You're working with a device of unknown calibration (that you can't calibrate properly), unknown and questionable accuracy, unknown and questionable precision, and unknown linearity. From a design consideration standpoint, the on-die [point] temperature sensors are little more than an overheat alarm--they just have to be good enough within a certain range so that the CPU doesn't fry. That's it.
Bookmarks