Just comparing to Ghostleader's nice Everest results for 475x9/1:2/1T/CL7/tRD6![]()
here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/FORUMS/...postcount=1512
Using Strong CT for this so I'm not sure if it's a direct comparison. Apart from that, it shows quite well the difference between 1T and 2T for Read and Latency.
Second screen shows how much extra I would need to reach about the same Read but still with higher latency for 2T. Wouldn't fancy trying to stabilise at 490FSB with tRD 6 though
![]()
Bookmarks