January 2006:
FX-60 2.6ghz 1.40vid 110watt
May 2006: AM2 launch.
FX-62: 2.8Ghz 1.40v VID 125w
Aug 2007
6000+ 3.0 Ghz 1.30-1.35vid 89watt
6400+ 3.2Ghz 1.40vid 125Watt
All 90nm
People said K8 would never make it past 3ghz, hell no one could even clock one past 3ghz reliably before late 2006 even with loads of voltage.
Don't get me wrong I think a 4ghz stock chip is DREAMLAND also, but don't discount the possiblity of 3.4 - 3.6ghz parts in a couple of steppings, on 45nm.
I've clocked endless AM2 K8s and the improvements over the last 2 yrs have been great, but there's a very obvious wall as far as the architecture goes, that in my opinion would stop them ever making it past 3.4 at a pinch, BUT K10 is not K8 and it's very obvious that K10 scales higher. Fact is even current Phenoms on problimatic 65nm scale better with voltage than these K8's
bottom line is, it's been shown before how quickly AMD can tweak their process when under pressure.. I don't think anyone would have predicted a 3.2ghz K8 X2 on 90nm back in 2005, that's netburst DC level clocks on an arch that's in complete contrast when it comes to reaching high freq.
We really don't know if 45nm will turn out to be as good as 90nm was, so lets all just wait and see





Bookmarks