Idf

[informal]

Thanks.
Was this a single socket with HT turned or or a dual socket with HT turned off?
If it's a single socket and running an unmodded Cinebench10 then those are HUGE numbers and I want one now to stick on the cancer research we do.

Movieman,JC already shown us the Bloomfield 2.93Ghz numbers for 32bit Cinebench(see the quote below).There is no way in hell that score was done with regular Cinebench 10.
From what i see (Sampsa's post) it indeed was a single socket SMT enabled Bloomfield 3.2Ghz chip,although overclocked and running 32bit OS and tested with modded Cinebech10.
User Boschwanza already explained that 45K result several times...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=20

Its just a bit logical . Cinema4d 11 Render engine will give you a boost up to 2.5x.

Nehalem 2.93 scores about 14k points with Cinebench 10 32Bit .. 3.2 will be around 17.000 * 2.5 makes 42.500 .. pretty close isnt it ?

With regular Cinebench10(unmodded with Cinema11 core), you can't jump from 17K(or 20K with 4ghz clock for Nehalem) to 40+K no matter how you look at it... From the exact 45850 figure,you can even calculate the OC speed of that 3.2Ghz Nehalem chip.It was OCed approx. ~1.2-1.25x,which gives us 3.84-4Ghz range (4850/ (17K x 2.2) ).I used the ~2.2x speedup for modded Cinebench since it varies a lot on different systems.