The GT200 seems to have only 240 SPs instead of the popular consensus of 256 + 96TMU. No redundancy that is, like the 8800GTX at launch.
They can't really shrink to much efficiency, they have to get a balance between the bus width (too big) and ROP count (too much). 384bit + GDDR5 in the future seems to be the best balance, otherwise they'd still have to use a 400+mm^2 die in 40nm!
Why are people disregarding a chance for ATI to make the same RV770, just with double the specs, and still a small chip compared to the GT200 later on (units are small compared to memory bus), I have no idea. That chip is apparently, called the R(V)870 or what you may say otherwise.
Heard GT200 info from a buddy who has looked at the core die itself, so I'd let you guys go on from there.![]()





Bookmarks