Could users with the new 45nm chips try using CPU-Z to report VID and compare that to what CoreTemp is saying?

If you go into the INI file for CPU-Z just set Sensor to OFF:

Sensor=OFF

and instead of it reporting your actual voltage it will display the VID of your chip.



I'm a little biased here as well. I just released RealTemp 2.5 which also displays VID and I'm interested in finding out which program is right. I think Intel and CPU-Z have a pretty close relationship and I tend to trust CPU-Z. I think CoreTemp might be reporting VID too low on the new 45nm chips.