Last edited by karl_eller; 03-03-2008 at 09:59 PM.
Desktop: Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 Ghz | P5E | 2x2 Gb G.Skill PC8000 | GTX 560 Ti | CM690 | TT TP 750 watt | Win 7 Pro x64 | Water Cooling
Server: i3 530 (Stock) | CM Vortex Low-Profile | Zotac H55-ITX WIFI | 2x2Gb Corsair 1333Mhz | IGP | VX450 | Server 2008 R2 x64
it is dude
they test competitors products in there
lot of the competitor offerings fail the tests (not talking about any in particular here)
JG and others probably know more about this than others >> lot of manufacturers will "relax" the testing to fit their products in a higher category = easier to sell. Good example is PCP&C 750W PSU and Seasonic X900 900W PSUs. Same PSUs >> one rated with looser than other yet they are exact same PSUs eek
temp testing, fan speeds and other considerations are very important in testing PSUs among other things and you can "play" with figures to get the rating you want sorta thing
from my understanding Corsair don't do that....they stick to very tough parameter testing for example using that blue oven to test the PSUs at 50C or whatever the figure was i can't exactly remember now.
I think one of their competitors using the same OEM in 1kW PSU is rating theirs as 1.2kW hehehe >> you get my point right
I am not dumping on Crosair, Indeed I actually admire their quality thats why I am so happy when I found out TX750 is actually Xigmatek's 750W model.
I also found out what the Corsair 1000Watt is about, and is good stuff.
Industry Vetern,
I don't know the rest, but sure movieman is old, he told me his age.
EK Water Blocks R&D
ekwb.com
![]()
Hobby: Rotary SS bench unit (LPG/R-507) | -75°C Auto-cascade (R-600/R-290/R-744) | Plate HX water chiller (1kW cooling power) | My 2nd cascade MP14FB R-507/R-1150 | Mini cascade R-507/R-1150 | GPU single-stage | Mach I restoration mod -> -38°C @ 230W
Milestones: 7.12GHz P4 | 6.84GHz K10.5 | 6.45GHz Ci5 | 3.31GHz K7
3DMark2001SE -> Favourite Game!
![]()
Even if the drop were as large as you imply the only place that the voltage actually matters is at the end of the connector (and that is where the specification is written to measure it). So as long as it is in specification there it doesn't matter. So the argument is a non-starter.
Last edited by [Spectre]; 03-05-2008 at 12:34 PM.
Paul Johnson
[H]ardOCP PSU Editor
Right. It's an argument that can go round and round. The resistance introduced by the additional connector is only responsible for less than 1% difference in load regulation even at full load. It's simply a non-issue.
And even the corrosion argument is a moot point. If the potential for corrosion is at the modular connector, then guess what? It's also there at the other end of the cable. Yeah, you have two corrosion points instead of one but then you enter a whole other argument.. why are you using your PC outside on the end of a pier?![]()
Poohball....your last 25+ posts have had to do with Xigmatek....are you an employee or are you trolling?
EDIT: 50+ of your 60something have to do with Xigmatek....![]()
Yeah.. same is true in other forums. Just Google "poohball" and "Xigmatek" and it's amazing.
Bought their product on Jan, studying it really hard, found lots of ignorant people, love to argue with them....that's all......
I usually start studying stuff that I likes.....
Johnny, is there anything else you can attack me besides that?
Yes I am in computer industry but not in the lower food chain like you refer to.
So what you've been doing on XS is merely trolling?Originally Posted by poohball
Hear ya loud and clear.
Bookmarks