Page 1 of 11 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 274

Thread: It's time to FORGET working a Yorkfield on a i680/i780 chipset...

  1. #1
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693

    It's time to FORGET working a Yorkfield on a i680/i780 chipset...

    Yes as you read......I think that there are BAD NEWS....
    i680 and i780 will NOT support retail Yorkfield as I informed....
    I hope they find a solution but I realy doupt about that.....

    NVIDIA doesn't give licence for the SLI to INTEL, so INTEL is "playing tricks" with them with the new CPUs....


    .
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Haha, battle of the giants.

    Tho I bet the 45nm issue on nVidia is something else. nVidia and chipset quality is not something that can be used in a positive sentense.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    melb,AUST
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    Yes as you read......I think that there are BAD NEWS....
    i680 and i780 will NOT support retail Yorkfield as I informed....
    I hope they find a solution but I realy doupt about that.....

    NVIDIA doesn't give licence for the SLI to INTEL, so INTEL is "playing tricks" with them with the new CPUs....


    .


    Looks like ati will be the way to go.
    Thanks for the info

    PS: love ur work

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    587
    Doh, means I'll have to fork out to replace my i650 board...

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    lol so intel plays the same game as nvidia now?

  6. #6
    Xtreme 3D Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    small town in Indiana
    Posts
    2,285
    It will be interesting to see what turns out to be the cause of the incompatibility. could you explain the problems? what kind of issues are there?
    QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
    DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
    2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
    Thermaltake 1KW Psu
    4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
    8GB crucial ballistix ram

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    559
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Haha, battle of the giants.
    lol, more like giant vs. mouse. It just so happens that nvidia is the dominant force in the graphics industry.

  8. #8
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post

    NVIDIA doesn't give licence for the SLI to INTEL, so INTEL is "playing tricks" with them with the new CPUs....

    .
    Is that official, or "not-official, but probably true"
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Montreal, Qc
    Posts
    550
    Lol Nice one by Intel I hope nVidia fuys will finally use their brains and let Intel use SLI...
    Main system:
    Q6600 G0 L737B 3,8GHz
    Maximus Formula X38
    Ballistix PC2-8500 2x1GB
    XFX 8800GT XT
    Corsair HX620
    X-Fi Platinum
    150GB Raptor (Dual Boot) /2x 250GB WD Caviar (Apps)
    Lian-Li V2000B Plus II

    School: MacBook
    Studying in: Pharmacy
    Where: University of Montreal

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyz View Post
    It will be interesting to see what turns out to be the cause of the incompatibility. could you explain the problems? what kind of issues are there?
    Curious as well.... how does Intel prevent theirs CPU to work on a certain chipset?

  11. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    is this related to this news topic?

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=165674

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    These threads should be combined:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=165674
    oh man

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Piotrsama View Post
    Curious as well.... how does Intel prevent theirs CPU to work on a certain chipset?
    They dont.

    There was a nVidia chipset that couldnt handle quadcores aswell if I dont remember wrongly.

    Anyway, I bet nVidia just took the shortroute. Now people also got a reason to upgrade to i790...

    Is this tested with the Asus i680 non reference board aswell?
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cruz Alta - CBA - Argentina
    Posts
    617
    OMG bad news.... but... mmm meybe i780 support 45nm... it no?
    I believe that people is working on 780's bios to support it and have a good performance and a good reading of multi
    iMac 24''
    BNDMOD @
    Cruz Alta (Cba.) Argentina

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Imladris
    Posts
    967
    It will be interesting to see how this turns out. I'm done with Nvidia Motherboards, have been for awhile now and this doesn't help.
    The little air system that could.


  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    In the land of Red....
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicksterr View Post
    lol, more like giant vs. mouse. It just so happens that nvidia is the dominant force in the graphics industry.
    Not really. Intel's imbedded graphics takes up more of the graphics market than Nvidia. While Nvidia DOES carry the performance crown, and has for quite some time, Intel still has most of the graphics industry. Something like ~60% isn't it? I can't remember the exact number, 60% could be far off, I just remember they have more of the market than Nvidia.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Montreal, Qc
    Posts
    550
    I almost bought a 680i chipset to do 8800GT SLI... Guess I made the good choice going with a X38
    Main system:
    Q6600 G0 L737B 3,8GHz
    Maximus Formula X38
    Ballistix PC2-8500 2x1GB
    XFX 8800GT XT
    Corsair HX620
    X-Fi Platinum
    150GB Raptor (Dual Boot) /2x 250GB WD Caviar (Apps)
    Lian-Li V2000B Plus II

    School: MacBook
    Studying in: Pharmacy
    Where: University of Montreal

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Aberdeenshire, Scotland
    Posts
    121
    Oh fudgecakes. I just ordered 2 new GFX cards for SLI to pair with my Yorkie!

  19. #19
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by [cTx]Baleful View Post
    Not really. Intel's imbedded graphics takes up more of the graphics market than Nvidia. While Nvidia DOES carry the performance crown, and has for quite some time, Intel still has most of the graphics industry. Something like ~60% isn't it? I can't remember the exact number, 60% could be far off, I just remember they have more of the market than Nvidia.
    Its very roughly 40/30/30 between Intel, nVidia and AMD in the GFX.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    I wasn´t expecting this

  21. #21
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Its very roughly 40/30/30 between Intel, nVidia and AMD in the GFX.
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/d...029062106.html


  22. #22
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by Piotrsama View Post
    Curious as well.... how does Intel prevent theirs CPU to work on a certain chipset?
    They could have not give all the specifications. But as yorkfield has supposed to work with a bunch of old intel chipset:
    http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3138
    "Elsewhere in the land of Intel chipsets, we have several manufacturers that will offer a combination of Wolfdale and/or Yorkfield compatibility on their 945GC-based motherboards. While this chipset does not specifically support 1333FSB operations, a couple of manufacturers have worked their BIOS magic to provide support. We might even see support on the venerable 975X chipset as ASUS is in the process of validation testing for their workstation boards. Even though the P965 chipset does not officially support the 45nm processor families, we have MSI offering BIOS support for two of their boards. We also expect to see "unofficial" support on the latest performance oriented P965 boards from ASUS and Gigabyte if stability problems when overclocking can be overcome. We will be testing a couple of their boards next week to see how well they work."

    I think it's a bit unfair to say it's Intel Fault.

    But I don't know if hipro is just disappointed or if he has some "real" informations. The word "retail" look like there was something new between es and retail?
    Last edited by nemrod; 11-14-2007 at 03:27 PM.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    587
    So much for all the supports 45nm CPU claims from the likes of Asus/Gigabyte, they all claimed it would work on i650/i680 boards with a bios update, surely they would have closely examined all the compatibility issues before adding such claims?

    Perhaps intel forced board makers to drop adding bios support for the new Intel CPU's, or else suffer the consequence of non delivery of their chipsets?

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    I think both parties just shot themselves in the foot.
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    I think both parties just shot themselves in the foot.
    If you look at Steam survey:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=165628
    Multi-GPU Systems (100 of 19219 Total Users (0.52% of Total)

    and consider that mean something,
    or consider sli support with vista
    ...
    you see that it's far to be clear that Intel shot in their foot if they don't have sli (intel or nvidia chipset)

Page 1 of 11 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •