MMM
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 67

Thread: The AMD Phenom processor is already available!

  1. #26
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    where is the price list from? any more info on the specs?

  2. #27
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,984
    4MB?

    2x512 kB L2
    2048 kB L3

    Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
    32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
    RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
    Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
    LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
    Meshify C white

  3. #28
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    yeah, so 4*512kb=2mb
    2mb+2mb=4mb
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,074
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    yeah, so 4*512kb=2mb
    2mb+2mb=4mb
    and since it's a native quad core the communication between the L2 is better..

  5. #30
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    ehh, I don't know about that. Each die has it's own l2 for intel's quads.

    But that's not a major issue. What is a major issue is that amd positioned the l2 cache in the center of the die so it has a short pipeline and thus has uber low latency. Problem is, the l3 is positioned between 11 friggin layers of metal, so it takes the signal more time to get there, thus the higher latency
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,074
    if i'm not mistaken a Q6600 is actually two E6600's joined together, while the Phenom has actual four cores, everyone single and apart..that means each core has it's own L2 while @intel the communication between the L2's in a dual core has to process and then to process with the L2's from the other two cores..

  7. #32
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    ehh, I don't know about that. Each die has it's own l2 for intel's quads.

    But that's not a major issue. What is a major issue is that amd positioned the l2 cache in the center of the die so it has a short pipeline and thus has uber low latency. Problem is, the l3 is positioned between 11 friggin layers of metal, so it takes the signal more time to get there, thus the higher latency
    L3 latency "problem" will be remedied by OCing(since we are at XS ).The problem "goes away" at ~2.4Ghz core speed and has even greater impact at higher OC speeds(past 2.6Ghz).Also independent IMC voltages and clocking will bring some more potential,since it was a major pita in K8/9 OCing endavours.

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_skills View Post
    if i'm not mistaken a Q6600 is actually two E6600's joined together, while the Phenom has actual four cores, everyone single and apart..that means each core has it's own L2 while @intel the communication between the L2's in a dual core has to process and then to process with the L2's from the other two cores..
    Two Meroms in Q6600 has to go over FSB in order to snoop each other's L2s.In K10's case,it's all done by L3.L2's are separated and they push down the data to L3 level.
    AMD's approach is better in multithreaded cases(which is an overall trend in programing today,especially games which can use more than one cores being available even today in some non trivial numbers)
    Last edited by informal; 11-03-2007 at 01:23 PM.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    You are correct about the e6600s being joined together, but I don't think you're correct about the l2 part. As far as I know, the cores are allowed to use only their own die's l2 cache, intel is very misleading when they say 8mb l2 cache for kentsfield or 12mb for yorkfield
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    So what? ;] It will eventually get ALOT faster. Just like K8 did.

    Let's bench some old A64 S754 against some AM2 A64. ALOT of improvement when it comes to clock-to-clock speed, and clock frequenzies aswell.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,074
    the L3 does the work of communicating like Informal mentioned it..
    i just couldn't remember the exact thing or express normally..
    it's physical 8Mb L2 on Kentsfield but not a true 8Mb due to it's communication

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    27
    No link/source from the OP ? Not saying it's an unlikely price, but what reason do we have to believe this is genuine?

  12. #37
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    You are correct about the e6600s being joined together, but I don't think you're correct about the l2 part. As far as I know, the cores are allowed to use only their own die's l2 cache, intel is very misleading when they say 8mb l2 cache for kentsfield or 12mb for yorkfield
    Intel's multi-core parts snoop over L2, its why snoopfilter on i5000x sucks with quadcore cpu's.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    567
    Quote Originally Posted by mnemonix View Post
    No link/source from the OP ? Not saying it's an unlikely price, but what reason do we have to believe this is genuine?
    You have to know the web sites of the main strategic distributors of AMD. That’s the price list of ISA Hardware.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,374
    So if the distributer is charging $247 for the chip, then it will retail for... $300?

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    Quote Originally Posted by xVeinx View Post
    So if the distributer is charging $247 for the chip, then it will retail for... $300?
    i think that list is retail prices. after doing some back and forth on newegg the prices on there are higher then the prices on newegg.
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0

  16. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    43
    hmm, almost all the available processors on that list match exactly the same price (give or take $2-5) before GST (Tax) from my wholesaler, so if that trend catches on with the phenom it means from a wholesale point of view the 9700 would be $30 (AUD) cheaper than the Q6600 o_O

  17. #42
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_skills View Post
    pre-order also available in our country and also prices are less than the Q6600:
    http://www.eurolink.co.yu/code/navig...?Id=2&pid=2187
    221 euros
    That product spec might well be wrong if launch speeds are 2.0-2.4GHz

    is the MHz scaling:

    2.0, 2.2, 2.4 or

    2.2, 2.3, 2.4? (this would also explain the small differences between prices)
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    lake forest, CA
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    But that's not a major issue. What is a major issue is that amd positioned the l2 cache in the center of the die so it has a short pipeline and thus has uber low latency. Problem is, the l3 is positioned between 11 friggin layers of metal, so it takes the signal more time to get there, thus the higher latency
    Minor nitpics....

    IIRC the L2 cache has similar latency to K8 L2, which isn't bad but its hardly "uber low latency". Also the high L3 latency has more to do with the SRAM cell they're using vs. what metal layers its buried in, very hard to get good yields on a SRAM that large+4 cores on a single die, something had to give so they increased their latency requirements.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,074
    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    That product spec might well be wrong if launch speeds are 2.0-2.4GHz

    is the MHz scaling:

    2.0, 2.2, 2.4 or

    2.2, 2.3, 2.4? (this would also explain the small differences between prices)
    i don't think it's wrong, i've received an e-mail from the store itself and they confirmed that they are receiving pre-orders due to 19th of November, when is the date the Phenom will be available for purchasing
    and yes, the amount is limited..bugger, i'm short on cash atm..

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    896
    It's showing up on Google Product Search also.
    http://www.google.com/products?tab=n...q=amd%20phenom

    2.2-9500,2.3-9600,2.4-9700 seems right.

    ISORM.com has ETA: Friday December 14, 2007.

    BLT has prices of $260.94, $291.50, $302.34.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    896
    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    That product spec might well be wrong if launch speeds are 2.0-2.4GHz

    is the MHz scaling:

    2.0, 2.2, 2.4 or

    2.2, 2.3, 2.4? (this would also explain the small differences between prices)
    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...m-slowed-again

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,074
    that's the price, 300% or about 220 euros..less then the Q6600 yet similar price in most markets..

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    A..T..L
    Posts
    415
    My DFI 590 SLI is saying gimme!
    AMD X2 3800+
    DFi LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G
    2 x 1Gb Crucial PC8500 [Anniversary Heatspreaders ]
    Custom Watercooling on the way
    Thermalright XP-90 right now
    27" 1080p HDTV for monitor
    Quote Originally Posted by The Inq
    We expect the results to go officially live prior to Barcelona launch in September. µ

  24. #49
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    AMD Phenom X4 CPU Prices Emerge

    ISA Hardware, AMD's master distributor of processors, has updated its price list to include AMD's first native quad core CPUs. Three new desktop Phenom X4 processors are now listed as actual:


    • HD9500WCGDBOX CPU Desktop Phenom X4 9500 (4MB,95W,AM2) box $247.00
    • HD9600WCGDBOX CPU Desktop Phenom X4 9600 (4MB,95W,AM2) box $278.00
    • HD9700XAGDBOX CPU Desktop Phenom X4 9700 (4MB,125W,AM2) box $288.00



    Source: ISA Hardware


    http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...06&postcount=1

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  25. #50
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    516
    me thats cheap a chips
    CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3600Mhz 24/7
    GFX: eVGA 8800GTS SSC 512MB
    RAM: 4GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
    MB: DFI LP LT X48-T2R
    HDD:150GB WD Raptor X
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W
    Screen: Dell 2407WFP

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •