Based on price, this is a win for ATI, since the 2900XT competes with the GTS. Anyways, it doesn't matter that there's a FPS cap. Max FPS is not interesting. Who cares if you get 20000 FPS in certain areas, but only 6FPS when something explodes? Is average FPS an interesting figure in such cases? Obviously not. The key FPS figure should be min FPS, and the average FPS number needs to be biased to make min FPS count more than max FPS.
There was another rumor about 112 shaders for G92. That's what I was referring to.
The 8800GTS and the 2800 are almost the same price. So I wouldn't mark it as a win for ATI.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
Build XT7 is currently active. Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit
Bookmarks