AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06 (Inq)

[StealthyFish]

Nothing against AMD !

Its just about this thread, TEN PAGES arguments just about "vapour", unbelievable !

Exactly, and from the Inq at that. We're from Xtremesystems, and we're taking from a dumbass from the Inq who calls Vista Ultimate, "Windows ME2 (Vista) Ultimate)? Are you kidding me? Wtf is ME2? Let's wait for someone more reputable to get their hands on the chip before we start making assumptions. Personally, I would have to say 30k my ass if the graphic cards are in 2x crossfire, but we'll see. Maybe I'll be proven wrong. Can't really prove or disprove anything right now.

You never stop making wasteful posts, first have you understood what he said?. He said the system had 4GB of ram and the Windows detected 3.24 now tell me what is wrong with that?. Sometimes windows does not recognize more than it was detected, because bios or config differs with amount of hardware ram processing, listen man he just told us the truth to what happened in that occasion, as I pointed earlier that 3D mark calculator I distrust at all because this system contained many new improvements, features never seen or benchmarked before. So probably they will update it later as for now I distrust it.

Please stop with the nonsense, double posts, wasted sentences, crap speaking and the most important have some education, read it before you reply, stop saying all the time it is a BS, looks like you got a day off to be trolling this thread.

And I have to say, you should take your own advice. 3dmark is calculated using a formula. They don't pull the numbers out of their ass every time you benchmark. There are set formulas. What you're hinting at is that futuremark decided to hide a bunch of features that wasn't to be benchmarked till later? I don't know that much about futuremark's 3dmark calculation, but I highly doubt it. The numbers all just input into formula. Just as you calculate the pythagorean theorum by inputting the values of "A" and "B" from a diagram of a triangle, 3dmark inputs the numbers it receives from the testing into the equation, regardless. If it was as subjective as you do hint, we wouldn't use it as a general benchmarking tool becuase if there's no uniformity, how can you compare systems? Your own post is wasteful in itself and you continue to repeat that you distrust 3dmark when your logic doesn't make any reasonable sense.