Quote Originally Posted by CraptacularOne View Post
Something else I picked out of this "article" to re enforce it's status as BS is...



Now, just how exactly is that possible? Anybody that knows how memory is handled will know. But is basically this: A 32bit OS only has 4GB total memory addresses. So with 2 512MB cards taking up the 1st GB that would leave Windows with an allocatable 3GB of system RAM, not 3.24GB.

This is BS and it did exactly what the writer intended it to do: Stir up controversy and draw attention to their sad excuse of a site (the INQ that is)

You never stop making wasteful posts, first have you understood what he said?. He said the system had 4GB of ram and the Windows detected 3.24 now tell me what is wrong with that?. Sometimes windows does not recognize more than it was detected, because bios or config differs with amount of hardware ram processing, listen man he just told us the truth to what happened in that occasion, as I pointed earlier that 3D mark calculator I distrust at all because this system contained many new improvements, features never seen or benchmarked before. So probably they will update it later as for now I distrust it.

Please stop with the nonsense, double posts, wasted sentences, crap speaking and the most important have some education, read it before you reply, stop saying all the time it is a BS, looks like you got a day off to be trolling this thread.