Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
you personally calculated that Penryn doesn't have even 2 Million more transistors for the core. Which is less than the original Pentium Pro. SOOO how can you expect such huge performance improvement so such a small addition of transistors to the Core and just 50% more Cache (which definitely will not give even 10% more performance, even in anyone's wildest dreams)

As is normal for you . You got it wrong. I said Penryn has 18% more logic transitors than Conroe. AT said 23% more logic.

Whats with you ? You can't read what the AT article said? Or is it you believe all things true come from AMD and all false statements come from Intel .

Trueth is nn-step AMD is going to be sucking rear tit for along time to come.