The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

[saaya]

This what you have been doing mostly. Dismiss, judge, and laugh of everything you don't have the ability comprehend or understand.

It is not a good idea to make fun of others meanings and ideas generally. It is a good idea to show respect for others ideas and meanings, specially when we are talking about a unreleased product with all those unknown factors around it.

You are one of those with biggest baseless claims in this thread, so I'm not surprised that you are reacting to my post. But this kind of reactions just proves the point in my previews post.

oh i think i understand you very well, but tbh, i couldnt care less why you post those hilarious comments

big baseless claims... like what?

Surprise surprise.

pickle surprise?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgWn7zbgxZ4

did you guys see the tsmc yield news from digitimes?
0.1-0.3 errors per square inch? fermi = ~ 1square inch...
so every 3-10 fermi chips there is one error? then yields would be 70%+ for fermi and 90% for rv870... weird huh? i wonder if he just made that number up or if he misunderstood it... maybe 0.1-0.3 errors per square millimeter?
that would mean 2-8 errors per fermi chip, on average... and around 1-3 errors per rv870 chip on average... nah thats too much, right?

weird...