Please post all 3D Mark Vantage Reviews here...
For now, all 3D Mark Vantage discussion will be here as well.
Please post all 3D Mark Vantage Reviews here...
For now, all 3D Mark Vantage discussion will be here as well.
Last edited by perkam; 04-17-2008 at 02:32 AM.
Yay! Another game to play![]()
Test #4 : Physics (with PPU)
= FAIL.
![]()
![]()
They must have thought 'oh snap' when Ageia got gobbled up by nVidia.![]()
Last edited by Tim; 04-16-2008 at 11:26 PM.
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
hmmmm idk...
they should finally make up their mind if they want 3dmark to be a 3d benchmark or a cpu benchmark or a system benchmark.
Pcmark is supposed to be the system benchmark, so they should split 3dmark into a REAL 3d benchmark and maybe launch some new CPU only benchmark.
all this cpu dependency in their last 3dmark series really annoys me...
there isnt a single game that depends that heavily on the cpu... and yes, maybe in some years there will be games that require that much cpu power, but thats not the point of 3dmark. the whole point of 3dmark was to show how gpus can handle future games in the next 1-2 years and how well they can handle the new techniques used in rendering.
2k5 was already off, 2k6 was even more off... i pray that vantage isnt even worse...
but to me it looks like they sold out...
intel wants the bench to show off their quads even tho nobody needs that much processing power, microsoft wants to show of vista even tho nobody likes the new features and performance sucks...
Last edited by saaya; 04-16-2008 at 11:43 PM.
Hmm. Vista only.
Shucks.
-
"Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320
So soon![]()
That´s what I have been waiting for![]()
Surely Vista and DX10 only had been known about for months?
Agree with the above comments about the over emphasis on CPU though...
Also, with Agea physics now ported to 8 series and above cards, this could end up really favouring Nvidia...
Serenity:
Core2 E6600
Abit IN9 32X-MAX
Corsair PC2-6400C4D
2x BFG OC2 8800GTS in SLI
Dell 3007WFP-HC
It was the first thing we found out and it's been known since the very start of the development.
Don't think so. If PhysX is to survive, AMD has to be on board. With sole support from NVIDIA, PhysX will fail miserably.Also, with Agea physics now ported to 8 series and above cards, this could end up really favouring Nvidia...
//Andreas
Thats true... and they have already said it will be an open API. ATi just need to implament it now.
Serenity:
Core2 E6600
Abit IN9 32X-MAX
Corsair PC2-6400C4D
2x BFG OC2 8800GTS in SLI
Dell 3007WFP-HC
my guess is that all records will be set without running the PPU test
Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
-
"Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320
3dmark is supposed to me about the newest and greatest in 3d technology for us end-users. If they would've kept DX9 they wouldn't have really made any real progress now, would they?
You wanna bench your WinXP rig? You have 3dmark 01,03,05 and 06 for that.
Vantage is for people who NOW have the latest and greatest in the industry and can run it (albeit slow) and for people who, in the future, will have something that can run it. You can't hang on to XP forever and expect every application to run on it.
Generalizations are, in general, wrong.
which raises the point will this be enough to kill xp for enthusiast users?
Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2
But with 3-4 way GPU setups making up such a small % of a small % of the market (enthusiasts/benchers still being ...~2%) I wouldnt class that as any kind of death-knoll....maybe just a cough that wont go away
I have no problem with future benches being DX10/Vista....all I need is Vista![]()
3DMark Vantage Launch Next Week?
The long awaited Futuremark 3DMark Vantage will be released on April 22nd it has been learned from a picture posted on PCPOP.com. Most notably 3DMark Vantage will differ from previous 3DMark video benchmarks with its DirectX 10 API. DirectX 10 support also means the program will work on Windows Vista only. When started 3DMark Vantage will run through three tests to determine your PC's performance - Jane Nash, Calico and Aeroplanes. If your PC is equipped with an AGEIA PhysX card, there will be a fourth test for physics only. The full list of all NVIDIA/ATI video cards capable of running 3DMark Vantage can be found here. An online test to see if your PC is up to the task for 3DMark vantage is also running online.
Futuremark Forums
http://www.techpowerup.com/58027/3DM...ext_Week?.html
My system
![]()
Last edited by mascaras; 04-17-2008 at 05:44 AM.
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
AFAIK yes, it'll be like 3D M06.
Two CPU tests, only this time the CPU tests won't be the same, the one will have to do with physics.
I could be wrong, because these are unofficial info and from a long time ago.
I've got no confirmed info about the tests.
Only thing I know is that I'll have a running version soon.
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
Bookmarks