MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Large Ivy Bridge 3570K vs Sandy Bridge comparison.

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Keeping in mind that 2600K has more cache.
    +1
    It was a mistake from the begining to compare i5 2500K 6MB L3 cache with i7 2600K 8MB L3 cache.
    L3 cache has it's role and in some application make's a big difference.
    2600K benefits best from HT but bigger cache helps too quite qood.
    Here are some of my results with my 2500K.
    More results tomorow.
    Vantage 3.4ghz Cpu - 17.722 IB 18903 + 6.7%
    Vantage 3.4ghz.jpg
    Vantage 4.5ghz Cpu -23141 IB 24187 + 4.5%
    Vantage 4.5ghz.jpg

    Cinebench 3.4ghz - 5.27 points IB 5.67 points + 7.7%
    Cinebench 3.4ghz.jpg
    Cinebench 4.5ghz - 7.09 points IB 7.67 point + 5.35%
    Cinebench 4.5ghz.jpg

    wPrime 32M 3.4ghz -10.43s IB 8.766s + 16%
    wprime 32M 3.4ghz.jpg
    wPrime 32M 4.5ghz - 7.47s IB 6.691s + 10.5%
    wprime 32M 4.5ghz.jpg

    Stock results are looking pretty good 7-10% and in some cases will be probably 13-15%.
    Average will be probably 10% improvement as it was sad from the begining.
    What it's strange in both Eggy results and mine is that after overclock to 4.5ghz the improvement of IB drops 40-50%.
    May be some early imature bioses which hinder performance of IB during overclock?
    Or higher cores temperatures to IB which affects performance.
    Last edited by xdan; 04-16-2012 at 03:22 PM.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •