MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 196

Thread: AMD's smoothness factor put to the test by AMD & HardOCP...

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    oh boy here we go again... and seeing who posted I am not surprised at all...

    Guess which on of the two will be "smoother"... but yeah its so unethical, illogical and shady to actually want to suggest a level playing field... well I'll be damned.
    Given your posting history it is predictable that you would not see anything at all wrong with changing the configuration to get results you want.

    There is no way that changing the configuration to get the results you want is the same thing as "leveling the playing fields" and you utterly fail at trying to justify the action you advocate.

    PLUS: You can't have it both ways. If you are going to benchmark without vsync and post those results and then advocate that for a different type of benchmark that vsync should be used then you are trying to have the best of both worlds. The answer is NO... hypocrisy in benchmarking is not allowed. One way or the other. Not both. If you want to use vsync then that is acceptable. However it must then be turned on for all benchmarks or your results are tainted.

    In truth the only thing wrong with this type of benchmark is that we need more data, different games and applications, and multiple "events" to obtain data.
    Last edited by keithlm; 01-26-2012 at 10:15 AM.
    FX-8350, Powercolor ATI R9 290X LCS, OCZ Vertex 4, Crosshair V Forumula-Z, AMD Radeon DDR3-2133 2x8Gb, Corsair HX1000W, Thermaltake Xaser VI, Xonar D2X, Water Cooling 140.3

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •