Are you saying that the firmware is stored in regular NAND?
--
Kingston SSDNow 40GB (X25-V)
459.96TB Host writes
Reallocated sectors : 12
MD5 OK
33.50MiB/s on avg (~84 hours)
--
Corsair Force 3 120GB
01 90/50 (Raw read error rate)
05 2 (Retired Block count)
B1 64 (Wear range delta)
E6 100 (Life curve status)
E7 13 (SSD Life left)
E9 328050 (Raw writes)
F1 436652 (Host writes)
MD5 OK
106.88MiB/s on avg (~84 hours)
power on hours : 1277
B1 has stopped decreasing, it is 2 up from last reading : from 62 to 64.
--
We are not going to change the test, the goal still is to find how long the drive can Endure writing, it is the main goal.
However, as a result of the Samsung and the m4 stopped working there is now a second goal, data retention.
It has been there all along and the m4 just confirms that we need to start looking at the phenomena.
The question is how do we validate the retention without making the test last for years and thus making the test academic and boring.
I am continuing as planned and will perform a short retention test at 500TiB on both drives, testing every 50 or 100TiB depending on speed might be what we need.
Instead of all drives going through rigorous retention testing we should start by selecting a drive (a fast drive e.g. the Samsung 470/830 or the m4) and perform more exact retention testing on that drive.
That way we can get to the core without breaking the main goal of the test.
The findings from this test can be used to specify how to perform a proper retention test.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks