Quote Originally Posted by yenclas View Post
Finally got 1600 8 8 8 24.

1600 8 8 8 24 is the same performance that 1866 9 10 9 28 ?
8 cycles @ 800MHz (the command clock is not doubled like the data rate) = 10ns
9 cycles @ 933Mhz = 9,65ns

So 1866 wins in both absolute latency and bandwidth. But better than teorizing is running some benchs yourself.