Quote Originally Posted by XSAlliN View Post
.Net is for lazy devs... easier to learn but has a bloatware feeling. I don't mind small applications based on .Net, but the GUI for a driver being based on it... well, that's when ATi drivers started to have more problems, yet that didn't stop them using "customers" as "beta testers" - as if it was just an "optional application" not a driver for their product.

And as long time ATi users know, ATi never gived a damn about their customers opinions, they just plunged in and keep on going with any decision they made... So, don't know what they're trying to prove now. We know they don't care - ATi drivers devs should kiss the ass of those from hardware projects department whom are behind all ATi cards, cause that was their real success... not drivers....
the driver is not .net, it would be in c# with c/asm (as its a driver), CCC has a .net xmal gui. xmal is one of the least space taking ways to make a skinned gui.

since amd made the new GUI it actually looks usable and it dose not have all that drop down crap that the ccc1 v2 had. it also only takes 20MB closed and 77MB loaded (with the transcoder), so its slimed down alot.