This is why a chart of people "scores" for anything other than vantage/06/05 etc is pretty much useless. If your table consist of people running different settings with different tweaks then really the end result means nothing
In all my time benching one thing which has popped up time and time again (and is hard to deny) is that in order to have any type of consistent and accurate results ALL participants must use exactly the same settings.
There are too many "variables" in this benchmark. There's no way to ensure users are actually setting tess-distance to 2.0 for example. Going by some of the scores I'd hazard a guess that atleast some users aren't.





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks