Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
Learn yourself to respect others ideas, before preaching education to others.

This is my ideas, we need a shrink to call it a new generation, otherwise we are going to get the same mess and confusions we had win G92-mess in this round form both AMD and nVidia. Just wait and watch.

Those who don't like my idea are free to express it in a constructive way. Those who are trying to get aggressive with personal attacks, I gotta say, just eat it.
These guys are being rude about it, but they are right. Architecture and process are two separate things. Architecture is the number and type of units in the core, their arrangement and connections, and other such details. Process is the physical implementation of an architecture onto a chip. An architecture could be implemented on different processes. And a particular process could be used to produce very different architectures. But a new generation requires a new architecture, not a new process as the examples already presented to you show. Are you saying G71 to G80 wasn't a new generation?

Saying that we should call something on the same process a new generation because it will confuse people is a logical fallacy called an Appeal to Consequences. Words have meaning, even if we don't like the results of that meaning.