Quote Originally Posted by RaV[666] View Post
You didnt reply me directly, BUT, taking from this.

The move from Pentium 4 Cedar mill x86 CPU ,based on 65nm process, to a Core 2 duo x86 CPU, based on the same 65nm process, in your EXPERT opinion doesnt qualify as a architectural change.
Mind blowing man.
You are taking about CPU, that's much more complex arena, and other world. Did you miss we are taking about GPU?

Tell me where the line goes for a architectural changes to call GPU new gen? Better performance and power usage would justify it? How about all those re.brand, and re-freshes, would you call them a new gen ( and they should get a new first digit)? Where does the architectural generation-line go for a GPU?

Who told you I'm an expert? I'm just trying to express my ideas.