Yep, same old same old, simple (naive, fanatic, or stupid ?) generalization is ahuh !
Yep, G92b the 270 mm^2 chip built on high yielding, plentiful supplied, cheap TSMC 55 nm process. Different story if we put GF 104, the 367 mm^2 chip built on low yielding (full fledged GF 104, where art thou ??), less abundant, relatively expensive TSMC 40 nm process. And to think GF 100 530 mm^2 chip has to get down so low fighting & competing in the mainstream segment, i just LOL'ed.
But ofcourse, there are brigades of ignorant jerks who think the world is flat as a table, as long they can play their favorite games in the basement. Nevermind.![]()







Reply With Quote
Bookmarks