20% faster sounds just right for dual gf104. Good for nvidia as it should be competitive with cayman and overclock well. But antilles is still another story though.
20% faster sounds just right for dual gf104. Good for nvidia as it should be competitive with cayman and overclock well. But antilles is still another story though.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
wow if 6970 and the 580 are both a bit faster than a 480, it could be a battle for top spot that keeps things really fierce. (ignoring duel gpu cards)
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
In case, a double-GPU with full 384 SP GF104 would probably perform good enough to compete. But this 580 seams to be some kind of refresh based on GF100.
Anyways, I think nVidia will do "something" really aggressive to counter the ''Cayman'' right at the time of resale. Because the current price-cut for countering the 68xx is indicating that the "peace" is over, and they are up for a good fight in this round.
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
I don't think anyone said he is always wrong. His accuracy is pretty amiss typically, but things at the Fab level(not performance), he has been rather accurate as of late.
More so for him to go against his code, to spew all things that hate Nvidia, he wouldn't just report something relatively postive and report it unless it was true.
The equivalent would be like Steve jobs saying PCs offer better value and macs are over priced.
Or George Bush saying the war in iraq was a mistake and much of the financial woes are his fault.
But anyways Kadozer don't be a.
Last edited by tajoh111; 10-21-2010 at 03:24 PM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Hey wasn't trying to be a banana just pointing out the possible fallacy in invoking Charlie even if it serves a purpose for an argument.
This doesn't sound like Nvidia's m.o.
They usually
-announce product
-announce the date of product to be officially announced
-at official announcement, they setup a website with a counter and possibly show a non working prototype
Keep in mind the logistics and time constraints of all this, and realistically don't see GTX 580 until mid Q1 2011.
I hope so or else AMD will do to us consumers what Kratos did to Poseidon...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEQc8n-844k
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
Maybe and for the better changed, Nvidia has changed its hyping tactics. The gtx 465 was hyped up more than the gtx 460 for example. I can't believe they called the crap that was the gtx 465, the next 8800gt.
In addition, this could be very well a paper launch to stop cayman sales(we might have performance numbers, but we won't be able to buy it from retailers) and anything Nvidia says before caymans launch would really antagonize the sales of the gtx 480 which still has a niche before cayman comes out. The gtx 580 is not a competitor for the 6870 so hyping it up when barts is out is pointless and would just add further scrutiny for their marketing practises.
If Nvidia had a big announcement for the release of a gtx 580 at this point, it would just kill gtx 480 numbers and really do nothing to the sales of barts.
Nvidia should be able to cook something up after the release of gf100 at this point, AMD was able to do it and they had a good product to begin with. NV has to do it because it has a seriously flawed product and if they ever want to get in the driver seat again, hopefully they have been feverously trying to get a new architecture or better yet experimenting on cards so they don't screw up their next release.
What the heck, trolling. I was just saying Charlie said this card might be coming. I wasn't even calling out other members or trying to get in a flaming costest. The tone of my post which Kadozer originally responded to was quite respectful. And he somehow still tried to imply my as the fanboy(which is definitely trolling). What's with double standards?
Originally Posted by tajoh111
Well if Charlie believes it(who would be the most pessimistic about NV releasing a response card), I would think it should be true.
How is that trolling? Especially in a thread which is specifically about the gtx 580? So basically if we don't say this card isn't coming out and the card is not being made, we are a troll, simply ridiculous. I think it might somehow be mistaken as trolling if this was the 6870 thread or an AMD thread. But in a thread that is specifically about the gtx 580? Man...I can't get some of these forum members reasoning.
I am not even being optimistic. In this thread, I have said if it comes out this year, it's likely going to be a paper launch. I have said nothing really about performance.
Last edited by tajoh111; 10-21-2010 at 04:29 PM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Last edited by Xoulz; 10-21-2010 at 04:11 PM.
That was already posted this thread hours before here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=247
The one good thing about this thread was it was containing all the fighting some what. I like when hardware news starts popping up all the newbs start making new threads.
The 512 cuda core card is possible the 768 core rumor is such an odd number. I'm sure they could do both, but not until march at the earliest. Looks like Nvidia will miss Christmas again lol. I wonder how nvidia's financial statements will look this quarter.
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
More FUD:
Could this be true?Originally Posted by Fudzilla
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
If nvidia is planning to counter "cayman" with the 580, i am pretty sure that it wouldn't be kept as a secret (we were hearing about the 480 aages before its release). Having a price drop on the day of release (like it just happened) makes sense, launching the 580 as a surprise on the day of "cayman" release seems very unrealistic. If they think it can beat the 69xx series (excluding antilles), wouldnt it make sense (also from a marketing/sales perspective) for them to brag about it as the release date nears? Maybe the cards are ready and they will announce a release date close to that of the ATi cards sometime soon
Last edited by h0bbes; 10-22-2010 at 06:39 AM.
Sorry if this is old news I just came accross it just now.
http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20101020PD223.html
Bookmarks