Page 13 of 24 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 581

Thread: Feser's New Lineup

  1. #301
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    Well, that's all I need. I've never been one to play by rules (unless they served my purpose) so here goes. These are the communications I've had with Fester.



    Disclaimer: The preceding "communications" did NOT actually take place and I'm not under any NDA with Fester. I am however under NDA elsewhere. This was only for fun.

    .

    Hmmm...
    upgrading...

  2. #302
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,884
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    Google couldn't translate all of that.

    I wont be testing them, that's skinnee's job.
    Indeed, I doubt anyone would trust your biased opinion (no offense) . Besides that, the day Feser sends you an item to test, I'll be glaring at the sky for pigs with wings .
    “Little expense had been spared to create the impression that no expense had been spared.” - Hitchhiker's Guide
    It's better to ask dumb questions now, than to look stupid later
    Mondays:

  3. #303
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by Alexandr0s View Post
    Indeed, I doubt anyone would trust your biased opinion (no offense) . Besides that, the day Feser sends you an item to test, I'll be glaring at the sky for pigs with wings .
    I 2nd that

  4. #304
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    Haha...you got me for a minute there..

  5. #305
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Miami,Fl
    Posts
    298
    Truth be told, their secret element, is carbon, or in it's planer 1-sp orbital bonded carbon state....graphene.
    It has 80 times the thermal conductivity in comparison to copper.

    Well... it would take something like that to back up the hype.

  6. #306
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by defect9 View Post
    the >9000 got me giggling like a tard
    lmfao it's over 9000!
    Smile

  7. #307
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Feser Admiral radiator mystery!

    >9000 blistering.

    Passed first week of October and nothing yet.

  8. #308
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Guys, there were clues in the entire post that it was nothing more than me having a little fun.

    1. Do you really think I would email them, and for that matter, Do you think they would respond to me, let alone reveal their newest products secrets?

    2. Unobtainium274. . .do I really need to say more?

    3. >9000
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  9. #309
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,884
    Either that, or their CS has an amazingly awesome troll !
    “Little expense had been spared to create the impression that no expense had been spared.” - Hitchhiker's Guide
    It's better to ask dumb questions now, than to look stupid later
    Mondays:

  10. #310
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    444
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    Nice find!

  11. #311
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    OK, so I had some spare time and was kind of bored on Monday and got to thinking about the tube size and layout on these rads. From all the available info I could find this is what I was able to come up with.

    Disclaimer: This is only a guess, there is no inside info that I know that led me to this "conclusion".

    Paper is 124mm x 61mm, the size they claim the standard 120mm series to be. I believe the O.D. of the tubes to be a little smaller than the dimes (17.82mm to 18.01mm), possibly 13mm to 15mm, the fins look to be about 2mm-3mm high, and the inside diameter of the tube is probably somewhere around 8mm to 10mm.

    Again, this is just more speculation but it seems close from what I've been able to figure out.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  12. #312
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,397
    Given the pictures, that's not unthinkable. You'd get pretty large gaps for air to flow through, possibly even better than the lowest FPI rads we have right now, which would in turn be a step towards solving the near-thermal saturation that we currently see with low speed fans on our radiators. Of course, the question is how much of that air would actually properly come in contact with the tubes...
    i7 2600K | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | GTX Titan | Corsair DDR3-2133

  13. #313
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Latvia, Riga
    Posts
    3,972
    But wouldn't that in turn overly too much reduce area of fins? Of course, it would be easier to blow through/less airflow lost from quiet & slow fans with weak static pressure, but just replacing fin area with easier to blow through seems wrong aswell. Just different chosen compromise. And probably could be done/got same and for much cheaper with classic rad design lowering FPI even furthier to some .. 4 FPI?

  14. #314
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    43
    All radiators are a compromise between air flow (volume of air that passes through the radiator) and air saturation (temp of air out/water out).

    To get higher air saturation you have to increase the area of fin that the air passing through the radiator comes into contact with, this can be done by either increasing the thickness of the radiator or using a higher fin density. No matter which way you go about it though the resistance that the air passing through the radiator will experience will increase, and therefore the volume of air passing through will also decrease due to the increased resistance.

    Browsing over results for triple radiators on skinnee labs the thin 14 FPI MCR320 actually performs better than the 8 FPI RX360 at the lowest fan speed (600RPM), which indicates that the MCR is actually less restrictive than the RX in terms of air flow despite having a much higher fin density. Since the fin density of the MCR is slightly less than double the RX, and it also only has slightly less resistance to the air flow through it (as shown by the slightly better performance at lower fan speeds) I think it is a reasonable assumption that if the MCR had 16 FPI it would perform virtually identically to the RX which is double the thickness with half the fin density.

    Essentially the point I am trying to make is that making thick radiators with low fin densities is pointless, as it costs a load more to manufacture (if retail prices of single thickness vs double thickness radiators is any indication) and the performance is identical to a radiator half the thickness with double the fin density (lower pressure drop is pretty much the only advantage of thicker radiators). For me the ideal radiator would be a single thickness radiator supplied with a fan shroud, which would give it essentially the same dimensions with the shroud fitted as a double thickness radiator but with better performance at the same fan speeds (assuming the double thickness radiator had half the fin density of the single).

    tl;dr thick low fin density radiators are not the solution to producing a better performing radiator with low production costs.

  15. #315
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    OK, so I had some spare time and was kind of bored on Monday and got to thinking about the tube size and layout on these rads. From all the available info I could find this is what I was able to come up with.

    Disclaimer: This is only a guess, there is no inside info that I know that led me to this "conclusion".

    Paper is 124mm x 61mm, the size they claim the standard 120mm series to be. I believe the O.D. of the tubes to be a little smaller than the dimes (17.82mm to 18.01mm), possibly 13mm to 15mm, the fins look to be about 2mm-3mm high, and the inside diameter of the tube is probably somewhere around 8mm to 10mm.

    Again, this is just more speculation but it seems close from what I've been able to figure out.
    Going by their figures on volume and length of tubing the inner diameter of the tubes is approx 1.13cm.

  16. #316
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18
    Any news on when you will have one of these Admirals for testing Skinnee?

    I am really looking forward on not only reading this review, but the Thermochill TA Review too.
    Keep up the good work.

  17. #317
    Never go full retard
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    3,984
    I'm not expecting to test the Admiral series in October. And trying to get the TA review complete this weekend.


  18. #318
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,065
    this thread is pure win!
    "The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands in times challenge and controversy."
    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    DIY: Self Clinching Nuts

    Canon EOS 7D | Tokina 12-24mm f/4 | Canon EF 24-105 f/4 L | Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS Mk II | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 L | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6 L

  19. #319
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    793
    so is it confirmed these rads have alu in them?
    They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result.
    Howlin' Pelle Almqvist

    Project Log Completed: all internal v1000

  20. #320
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,910
    Feser ownage

    Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
    Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
    OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
    OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
    Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
    XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
    Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
    Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
    M-Audio Audiophile 192
    LG W2486L
    Liquid Cooling System :
    ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
    Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
    Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
    Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
    3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''

    Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
    CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
    RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
    SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
    HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
    OS: Mac OS X Mavericks

  21. #321
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by LogAn'sRun View Post
    so is it confirmed these rads have alu in them?
    i think the only thing confirmed at this point is that the feser website is an assualt on your senses

  22. #322
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Feser Admiral radiators - release delayed

    Quote Originally Posted by Artem
    We tried to contact Feser in order to clarify some details about its new radiator line-up Admiral. Unfortunately, there is nothing new we could find – the manufacturer stated they continue to work on the radiators, which, WE BELIEVE, will inevitably lead to changes in some specifications, published earlier. The actual release date of the final product is also delayed.

    Despite the great interest to Feser’s new radiators, we’ll all have to wait a bit more – Admiral rads is a new generation of radiators for PC water-cooling with all its wealth of innovation.

    Manufacturer has to create new product practically from scratch so to please us with best performance and reliability of the product.
    http://hw-lab.com/feser-admiral-radi...e-delayed.html



    Quote Originally Posted by LogAn'sRun View Post
    so is it confirmed these rads have alu in them?
    Not confirmed, only rumoured.

  23. #323
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Acreageville, Alberta
    Posts
    1,411
    Facepalm.....


    Running out of reasons to dissagree with WL...

    I know it is five years in Hypersleep to get back from Pandora, so these MUST be made from Unobtainium.

  24. #324
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    41
    any link for test review on these rads full of innovations

  25. #325

Page 13 of 24 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •