Quote Originally Posted by Toolius View Post
not even if we say pwetty pwease ?
Not that im going to be buying these but just very very curious but i understand NDA's and will happily wait
cheers and kind regards
Well, that's all I need. I've never been one to play by rules (unless they served my purpose) so here goes. These are the communications I've had with Fester.

Dear Sirs,

I was wondering if you could tell me what the materials are that you use in your Admiral line of radiators. There is much speculation about the inside of the tubes being made from aluminum and there is already a number of people concerned about corrosion when these are used with loops containing copper. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Waterlogged
Dear Waterlogged,

We are surprised you would write to us considering your reputation concerning our company and products. We would be happy to tell you if you were to sign this NDA and fax it back to us.

Martin
Dear Waterlogged,

Materials used for the Admiral Line of radiators are a follows;

Tubes: 2 piece - inner shell is made from Unobatinium274 which has a thermal conductivity (Thermal Conductivity
Btu / (hr - ft -°F)) of >9000 and is completely inert when used with other metals (such as copper/Brass/Nickel). Outer shell is made from Aluminium 6061-T6 which can be anodized to any color.

End tanks: these are also made from Unobatinium274 with a Aluminium shell.


We remind you that you are now under agreement to the NDA that you signed and the preceeding info should not be repeated until end of the NDA agreement.


Martin
Disclaimer: The preceding "communications" did NOT actually take place and I'm not under any NDA with Fester. I am however under NDA elsewhere. This was only for fun.

Quote Originally Posted by Mavhenz View Post


Noo!!!!
Don't say that....
Quote Originally Posted by meanmoe View Post
High CFM... really? That's disappointing if true...
I should clarify my statement a bit. With the apparent lack of surface area compared to traditional rads, the more air you can get over the tubes of these is going to mean better temps. These may actually be suited to using slipstreams on.

I also have another concern that I noticed before when the "site leak" occurred and has been confirmed with the site coming back online. I noticed they provide the linear length of the cooling area and decided to compare it to a 25mm spacing TC PA120.2 I have. The Admiral 240 standard gets it's ass kicked by 8 feet (hell, even the 280 standard is short by 3.25' ). Visible tube length on the PA is roughly 10" x 24 tubes = 240" ÷ 12 = 20" of "cooling path". Now, even a 15mm spaced is losing a little to the old PA but nowhere near that much so I', guessing that even the 15MM spaced rads are gonna kick these in the ass as far as "cooling path".