MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 213

Thread: Best performing/value SSD or duo, at 40-100GB?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    685
    Thanks for offering your thoughts AceNZ.

    Quote Originally Posted by AceNZ View Post
    Max sustained read or write on a WD Black 1TB is 113 MB/s.

    Max seq read on the X25-V is 170 MB/s, and max write is 35 MB/s. So a pair of them in R0 could be almost three times as fast as the HD in read, but only about 60% in multi-threaded or large block writes.
    Actually I'm wanting to compare a SSDNow V G2 64GB, & OCZ Vertex (or Adata) 30 or 60GB*, to the Black & F3.
    The X25-V's are being considered for my OS/boot volume, not my scratch-disk.

    Most disk access patterns are heavily read-weighted, and more random than sequential -- so unless you're doing something particularly write-heavy, you should be better off with the SSDs than the HD.
    No this is for a scratch-disk (I outlined my workflow earlier), not an OS/boot volume.
    I'm considering a 2nd X25V for my OS/boot volume.

    It can improve sequential too; the maximum sequential data rate is higher toward the outside edge of the drive. Here's a graph I did that shows typical HD sequential performance as a function of position:
    Ah thanks for confirming...
    I wonder what sort of sustained/seq performance boost I'd be getting if I short-stroked it to 500GB?
    Judging by that graph it'd be approx. 70MBps...

    *Or any other SSD with high seq/sus. R+W & lowest $/GB (don't need much more than 60GB total capacity)
    Last edited by jalyst; 07-28-2010 at 07:53 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •