Quote Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Unfortunately I've only got a WD1001FALS (WD Black 1TB) or a HD103SJ (Samsung F3 1TB)...
Would seq/sustained r+w differences between my proposed SSD RAID-0, & one of these drives (short-stroked) be negligible in real world terms?*
If you know, what exact differences are we talking?
Max sustained read or write on a WD Black 1TB is 113 MB/s.

Max seq read on the X25-V is 170 MB/s, and max write is 35 MB/s. So a pair of them in R0 could be almost three times as fast as the HD in read, but only about 60% in multi-threaded or large block writes.

Most disk access patterns are heavily read-weighted, and more random than sequential -- so unless you're doing something particularly write-heavy, you should be better off with the SSDs than the HD.

Quote Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Actually short-stroking only improves random I/O doesn't it?!
It can improve sequential too; the maximum sequential data rate is higher toward the outside edge of the drive. Here's a graph I did that shows typical HD sequential performance as a function of position:

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	23832ch1005.jpg 
Views:	373 
Size:	31.6 KB 
ID:	106350