Page 64 of 123 FirstFirst ... 14546162636465666774114 ... LastLast
Results 1,576 to 1,600 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

  1. #1576
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    747
    ah my bad. yes that makes sense as I've just looked at my 260 and 4890 runs on my old E8400 and the 4890 has a much higher GPU score but the 260 has a better overall P-score due to the massive cpu score :/ ghey
    || 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
    || P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
    || 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
    || 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||

  2. #1577
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    So funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
    where do you see domination in dirt ? actually that is the game where 480 and 5870 are very close AvsP should be right and thats according to nvidias own bench
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  3. #1578
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    where do you see domination in dirt ? actually that is the game where 480 and 5870 are very close AvsP should be right and thats according to nvidias own bench
    You need some reading skills....

  4. #1579
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    futuremark is blocking physix enabled cpu scores, i think you can upload it but it doesnt show up in the orb when you search for results, or it doesnt show up in the rankings...

  5. #1580
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    You need some reading skills....
    lol what ?
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  6. #1581
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    futuremark is blocking physix enabled cpu scores, i think you can upload it but it doesnt show up in the orb when you search for results, or it doesnt show up in the rankings...
    mhm i just noticed the extra bit of text on my physx enabled result

    Please note that this result does not comply with the rules defined in the Driver Approval Policy for 3DMark Vantage and will not be visible on default result search on the ORB or on the Hall of Fame. Please ensure that you are using approved display drivers and system software versions provided with 3DMark Vantage or use the "Disable PPU" option.
    Either way that score posted is quite bad :s
    I'm getting 20219 without physx.
    System 1 (mine):
    CPU: i7 920 D0 stable at 4.0 GHz cooled by Scythe Mugen 2000
    GPU: PowerColor HD5850 (950/1250 1.2V)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 Memory: 6GB DDR3 GeiL @ 1528 MHz
    System 2 (gf's):
    CPU: i7 920 D0 currently at 4.2 GHz cooled by Noctua NH-D14 (needs more tweaking/testing)
    GPU: Club3D HD5850 (awaiting OC)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Memory: 6GB DDR3 Corsair @ 1600 MHz

  7. #1582
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by Musho View Post
    So funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
    indeed i've notest the same...

    i play better DIRT2 with GTX280 than 5970 isn't that something weird?


    SILVERSTONE TJ07 . ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME . INTEL C2D E8600@ Q822A435 . 6GB CELLSHOCK PC3 15000 . EVGA GTX 285 . WD VELOCIRAPTOR 300HLFS . WD AAKS 640GB ''RAID0 . CORSAIR HX 1000W . X-Fi FATAL1TY TITANIUM . LOGITECH WAVE . G9 LASER . Z5500 . DELL ULTRASHARP 2047WFP
    Aquaero VFD . Enzotech revA . Laing DDC 12v . Black Ice GTS-Lite 360 . Swiftech Mcres Micro . 3/8"
    By MrHydes®

    sales
    feedback Techzone

  8. #1583
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    64
    Vantage score doesn't represent the real game performance.
    Nvidia's Fermi GTX480 is broken and unfixable,Hot, slow, late and unmanufacturable
    As we have been saying since last May, Fermi GF100 is the wrong chip, made the wrong way, for the wrong reasons.
    by Charlie Demerjian

  9. #1584
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Just wait till Sony turns the emotion engine on guys, real time Toy Story graphics!!!!!

  10. #1585
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by MrHydes View Post
    indeed i've notest the same...

    i play better DIRT2 with GTX280 than 5970 isn't that something weird?
    whats next 8800 being better in dirt
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  11. #1586
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    747
    hmm my overclocked 4850 ran dirt 2 better than my gtx 280
    || 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
    || P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
    || 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
    || 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||

  12. #1587
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahmer View Post
    mhm i just noticed the extra bit of text on my physx enabled result

    Either way that score posted is quite bad :s
    I'm getting 20219 without physx.
    it must be fake then, fermi is going to be twice as fast as their fastest current card...
    how much does a gtx285 score again?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMojoZ View Post
    Just wait till Sony turns the emotion engine on guys, real time Toy Story graphics!!!!!
    hahh yeah, marketing ftw
    and i remember nvidias cineFX pr stuff... games will look like hollywood movies on your geforce fx! (at 0.001fps )

  13. #1588
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    hahh yeah, marketing ftw
    and i remember nvidias cineFX pr stuff... games will look like hollywood movies on your geforce fx! (at 0.001fps )
    And what about Cinema 2.0 from ATI. We are always waiting for the "real" Ruby's demo

  14. #1589
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Face Clinic, Harley Street
    Posts
    282
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    And what about Cinema 2.0 from ATI. We are always waiting for the "real" Ruby's demo

  15. #1590
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,671
    So a £300 GTX 470 is on par with my crossfired 5770s for £240?

    <----- Happy

    (I could actually sell my 5770s and get one of those).

  16. #1591
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    162
    ZipZoomFly had the Asus GTX 470 listed for $450..... WOW

  17. #1592
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    And what about Cinema 2.0 from ATI. We are always waiting for the "real" Ruby's demo
    hmmm dont remember that one... but im sure ati did the same... im not saying its just nvidia, its pr in general... its usually the most funny when they try to convince normal non technical and uninformed customers about the features of their latest products. companies will come up with the wildest claims

    i remember intel making a weird remark at idf about nehalem, saying it will cure cancer, reduce the costs of gas and oil and help us explore space... cause thats what scientists use cpus for... still, its a pretty far stretch to claim a small chunk of molten sand will cure cancer and reduce our gasoline bill etc

    Quote Originally Posted by MrDiaz View Post
    ZipZoomFly had the Asus GTX 470 listed for $450..... WOW
    why wow? isnt it slower than a 5870 which is 399?
    i thought it was supposed to be 349?
    or do you mean wow as in 100$ more than rumored?

    metro 2033 benchmarks at xbitlabs... 5870 performs the same or better as a 295... weird... i thought this was an nvidia optimized game?
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...3_4.html#sect1

  18. #1593
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by MrDiaz View Post
    ZipZoomFly had the Asus GTX 470 listed for $450..... WOW
    Not a shock to me.

    Afterall, I was calling it (another) $600+ launch since Sept (cause of extreme costs and precendent and all).

    And kindly rebuking those "its gonna launch in Nov for $299-$399" crazies.

    Fermi threads have been so crazy, I don't think anything can be shocking - not even the unicorn included with every EVGA GTX480

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  19. #1594
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hollywierd, CA
    Posts
    1,284
    wasn't nvidia suggesting retail prices of $380 and $480?

    i just realized... GTX480 with 480 shaders for $480. silliness.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    I am an artist (EDM producer/DJ), pls check out mah stuff.

  20. #1595
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield Evergreen
    Posts
    607
    Just ordered a pair of 5870 Vapor-X and I'll sit and watch to decide whether to RMA them or not Can't waste more ages for my new rig.

  21. #1596
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Face Clinic, Harley Street
    Posts
    282
    Quote Originally Posted by 570091D View Post
    wasn't nvidia suggesting retail prices of $380 and $480?

    i just realized... GTX480 with 480 shaders for $480. silliness.
    thats not silliness, this is patrick after he picked up a GTX480 for $480


  22. #1597
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    652
    Quote Originally Posted by DosDuoNo View Post
    thats not silliness, this is patrick after he picked up a GTX480 for $480

    He might be pretty pissed if it doesn't come in eggshell texture with a raised font.....
    HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"

    Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now

  23. #1598
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by 570091D View Post
    wasn't nvidia suggesting retail prices of $380 and $480?

    i just realized... GTX480 with 480 shaders for $480. silliness.
    What, $1 per shader and you still complain?

    Imagine the price of a 5970 with 3200... And they say NVIDIA is pricey
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  24. #1599
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    i thought this was an nvidia optimized game?
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...3_4.html#sect1
    See what happens when you base expectations on random forum ramblings? Did the developer claim it was an nvidia optimized game?

    http://www.legionhardware.com/articl..._guide,10.html

  25. #1600
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    652
    Somebody posted this elsewhere......

    Can anybody confirm that there will be no benches released tomorrow????

    March 26

    * Official GTX470/GTX480 NDA Expiration
    * Launch date for North America
    * Specifications are released
    * Official pricing info is released
    * NVIDIA Demos GTX470/GTX480
    * Partners receive revised GTX470/GTX480 shipments (due to BIOS update and cooler change)

    March 27

    * Partners ship out cards to retailers
    * Previews are released
    * Launch date for Europe

    March 29

    * Shipping companies have partner shipments in transit
    * Benchmarks officially posted
    * Reviews are released

    April 2

    * Retailers receive shipments from partners
    * Preorders are posted for online retailers

    April 5

    * Stock is put into inventory and paperwork is filed

    April 6

    * Online retailers post stock for GTX470/GTX480 cards

    April 12

    * GTX470/GX480 hit the selves for stores (Microcenter, etc...)
    * Orders are officially online and purchasable
    HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"

    Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now

Page 64 of 123 FirstFirst ... 14546162636465666774114 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •