Fixed!Originally Posted by Behemot
Fixed!
Donate to XS forums
So hey... if the NDA is lifted on the 26th, is that going to be EST time or what? Cause technically we can get reviews today starting at 12pm EST from the other side of the world!
IF it is indeed delayed, then i feel like nvidia is manipulating the consumer. I am pretty sure they knew the proper launch date (april 12th now?), but they instead said it would be released earlier so that more people would wait for it instead of getting an ATI card for example. Even if these are just rumours (but they do end up becoming true), its better for nvidia to spread rumours than making official announcements about each fictional launch date. Even if they were honestly planning to release it earlier but failed, it doesnt make the situation any better. I really hope Fermi is a good card (or at least not a "failure") but there is no need to treat us like idiots.
PST i guess
Coming Soon
Well.... NDA could lift today at 2pm. nVidia might be playing the released to retail card here, to separate NDA from availability. No-one is expecting good availability for weeks, so if release is postponed, the no-mans land of "available" Vs actually BEING available is shorter... which looks less bad, just a shame that most people spell F-E-R-M-I as D-E-L-A-Y no-one matter how is played or spun.
ALL SPECULATION
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
Sweclockers (swedish forum / news site) claims their review will be up 1 minute past midnight tonight if I recall correctly.
Thats 9h from now.
Project TJ07 WeeMaan edition in progress...
i7 920 @ 4,4ghz, P6T Deluxe, Corsair Dominator 6Gb, HD5870, OCZ Vertex 60gb + Samsung F1 1tb
Heatkiller copper, EK 5870, Thermochill 120.4, DDC 3.2
480 can't be 625mhz or anything, if it was it would be practically indistinguishable from 470.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
Why 480 has 480 shaders also it has greater no of other units as well....
Coming Soon
Which, if everything was linear (which it isn't) would make a 7% better card than 470, which is impossible.
About availability. One week after launch was OK and even "standard practice" but two weeks is a lot, plus whatever changed in the BIOS and the cooler probably won't be reflected in the reviews which have already been written.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=4931
That cant be right, can it? Its overclocked and the score is total gash
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
check my sig...
its getting old and i had hoped to change it in a day or two, but it seems ill have to use it for a few more weeks...
nvidia manipulating the consumer??? gez man! get a grip! they have done no such thing and never will!
isnt that with physix?
hmm I get over 12500 GPU pts on an overclocked 4890 with an E8400 :/ So this means an overclocked 470 is only around 30% faster than a 4890? :/
seems pretty trash to me
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
Of course,over 50k cpu score cant be posssible without gpu physX...
Vantage and Crysis seem to be the worst apps for Fermi.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Wouldn't be surprise if tomorrow I see a lot of sad faces or some going emo and /wrist because of disappointing...not saying I know what results are going to be, but I don't expect a miracle either from what we seen so far.
░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░
gpu score 16645 with overclock? I think my 295 does about 18000 points default. Maybe the overclock isn't very hi in 470.
Nvidia's Fermi GTX480 is broken and unfixable,Hot, slow, late and unmanufacturable
As we have been saying since last May, Fermi GF100 is the wrong chip, made the wrong way, for the wrong reasons.
by Charlie Demerjian
As opposed of G200
But that P-score is about 33% higher than the score posted by jared a few pages ago (14992)
So funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
Because he used Physx in this run, I think. Not sure if he used it in the previous run as well, haven't seen that screenshot.As opposed of G200
But that P-score is about 33% higher than the score posted by jared a few pages ago (14992)
Physx doesn't do anything to the pscore i don't think. I could be mistaken though?
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
I doesn't? Oh, my mistake then. I always thought it did, and that that was the reason they banned Physx enabled results from the ORB.
Pretty sure it adds a couple thousand...
@Musho :
banned from orb? don't you mean banned from hwbot?
System 1 (mine):
CPU: i7 920 D0 stable at 4.0 GHz cooled by Scythe Mugen 2000
GPU: PowerColor HD5850 (950/1250 1.2V)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 Memory: 6GB DDR3 GeiL @ 1528 MHz
System 2 (gf's):
CPU: i7 920 D0 currently at 4.2 GHz cooled by Noctua NH-D14 (needs more tweaking/testing)
GPU: Club3D HD5850 (awaiting OC)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Memory: 6GB DDR3 Corsair @ 1600 MHz
The end of the world is approaching... get readySo funny, ATI is dominating in Vantage and Crysis, which used to run way better in nVidia hardware, while nVidia is dominating in DIRT and Battleforge, which are "ATI's" games.
You're right, previous scores are way too low to have physx enabled.
It indeed does change a lot.
No physx
Physx On
GPU score is higher on first image, but P-score is lower due to physx.
Bookmarks