Page 81 of 109 FirstFirst ... 31717879808182838491 ... LastLast
Results 2,001 to 2,025 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

  1. #2001
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    38

  2. #2002
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by mapel110 View Post
    621 mm˛ die size?

  3. #2003
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    The images are correct. There's no point in nitpicking over it, they did some analyzing at B3D and there's nothing up with either on the benchmark

  4. #2004
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Yep, they made a chip that's bigger than what TSMC is physically capable of

  5. #2005
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    900MHz memory can't be right.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  6. #2006
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    319
    memory only 900MHz ???,
    the screen shot looks legit
    2x Asus P8Z68-V PRO Bios 0501
    i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz 1.325v / i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz 1.300v
    2x G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB DDR3 1600
    Plextor M5P 256GB SSD / Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD
    Seasonic X-1050 PSU / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold PSU
    EVGA GTX 690 (+135%/+100MHz/+200MHz/75%) / EVGA GTX 680 SC Signature+ (+130%/+80MHz/+200MHz/70%)


  7. #2007
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by icecpu View Post
    memory only 900MHz ???,
    the screen shot looks legit
    GPU-Z does not support Fermi yet, it is a fake.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  8. #2008
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Well, if the GTX 470 is indeed 800 MHz GDDR5, then 900MHz from the 480 isn't out of the realm of possibility

    Strange to see that a 256-bit 5870 might have matching bandwidth capability

  9. #2009
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    it is a fake.
    Wrong word, it's real!

  10. #2010
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Czech Republic, 50°4'52.22"N, 14°23'30.45"E
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    900MHz memory can't be right.
    Why not? It's the frequency which HD 4870 used. Remember it's first time NVIDIA has GDDR5. They can be just careful.
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    I think we should start a new "Fermi part <InsertNumberHere>" thread each time it's delayed in this fashion!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Heck, I think we should start a whole new forum dedicated to hardware delays.

  11. #2011
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Behemot View Post
    Why not? It's the frequency which HD 4870 used. Remember it's first time NVIDIA has GDDR5. They can be just careful.
    nvidia already used 850mhz GDDR5 on GT240.

  12. #2012
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by mapel110 View Post
    Is this real?

  13. #2013
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by RaV[666] View Post
    First of all, christ people, Unigine looks pretty much identical on both ATI and NVidia, if it werent, one camp or another would call out CHEATER!
    Second of all

    We have already got to the conclusion that using 2560x1600 on a 1GB card causes dramatic fps drop due to the framebuffer taking such a large amount of memory.
    For the people with monstrous 30" displays there will be 2GB 5870 shortly in few different flavours(including OCed one).
    So again these results arent exactly comparable.
    yeah that pretty obvious 5870 1 gb s_cks for ultra high res now weird part is company that made this card had eyefinity tech as ad at least nvidia did smart move in tam choice kudos to them
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  14. #2014
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    563
    The final clocks are not out yet, im sure the memory will be at 1100mhz minimum.

  15. #2015
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Lol @ release date. Wow it even has the DAY of release
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  16. #2016
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    That's OK. The BIOS version (gigabyte) and a lot more are not OK. Fake.

  17. #2017
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    371
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    yeah that pretty obvious 5870 1 gb s_cks for ultra high res now weird part is company that made this card had eyefinity tech as ad at least nvidia did smart move in tam choice kudos to them
    Actually it's the other way around. ATI currently caters to 99% of the market while the remaining percent will have 2 GB in a short while. The 4XX series are needlessly expensive to make.

    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    900MHz memory can't be right.
    Makes sense - it's most likely low voltage GDDR (ie. like the one used in HD5970) to keep down TDP

  18. #2018
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    If what you said is true, then nVIDIA lied in a public technical specifications pdf.
    And you're wrong about load balancing via the driver.
    That would be the silliest move ever.
    "CUDA cores" can be dynamically assigned to various tasks and load balancing should and is done by hardware not software.

    Not an elegant thinking I'd say
    Which part of the "specifications pdf" would be wrong if my claims are true?

    NVIDIA claimed that GF100 has stellar tessellation performance, which might well be true. But they never claimed that tessallation wouldn't affect shader performance.

    If you have info that disproves what I said, by all means do share it.

  19. #2019
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    637
    Not sure if posted already, but anyway.

    http://hothardware.com/News/NVIDIA-L...d-Vision-Demo/

    So it beats the HD5870 on heavy tessellation, but it's a tie on "normal" usage.
    Would that mean that the real advantage of Nvidia will be on future DX11 games, and not on current DX9/10 games?

  20. #2020
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    If the advantage is for future dx11 games, then thats not really an advantage for consumer usage. By the time there is any spectacular or even semi decent game (AvP is bad and runs poorly anyway) there will be MUCH better dx11 hardware out. What matters is current games, if gtx480 is the same as 5870, then whats the point for consumers? I want performance in current games not games in 2 years, if I did I'd buy a card in 2 years. If gtx480 does in fact more or less equal 5870, then theres no reason to buy any card from this generation as simply put its just not a big enough step up in performance on any level.

  21. #2021
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Izmir/Turkey
    Posts
    32
    lol, my memory bandwith is better


  22. #2022
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    811
    Quote Originally Posted by orangekiwii View Post
    If gtx480 does in fact more or less equal 5870, then theres no reason to buy any card from this generation as simply put its just not a big enough step up in performance on any level.
    This is specially true for me. My 295 is faster than a 5870 at all levels, and drivers apart, (because CCC is a real PITA), if the 480 doesn't beat my 295 by a considerable margin there's no reason for me to change video card to a 480.

    I want a bit more of juice than the 295 can deliver and the logical step would be a 5970 in case the 480 fails to impress. Thing is... The software sucks to be real honest about CCC, when will ATI deliver simple stuff like game profiles, i've been asking for this forever

    I need AA8x for Crysis, but then i want to force AA16x in older games. Some games i want them with Vsync, some others i have to disable it (video card fails to deliver constant 60+fps) and i want all of this to be automatic when i start the game like nVidia drivers do.

    I really like the 5970, don't get me wrong, but i always feel that something's missing when i use my other PC with the 4870x2 in it, this keeps me away from ATI for now
    ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
    8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"

  23. #2023
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    lol@you guys actually thinking gpu-z "measures" things. It has a database for its information. If it says 620mm2 and 512 shaders, this doesn't actually mean it has measured the chip's size or anything. It just displays what its makers put in it as information.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  24. #2024
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by NaMcO View Post
    My 295 is faster than a 5870 at all levels
    At all levels of Far Cry 2 right? Or do you have a special 295?

  25. #2025
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    lol@you guys actually thinking gpu-z "measures" things. It has a database for its information. If it says 620mm2 and 512 shaders, this doesn't actually mean it has measured the chip's size or anything. It just displays what its makers put in it as information.
    Its fake, although clocks do get measured by GPU-Z (thats about the only thing actually measured though)
    Last edited by zerazax; 03-06-2010 at 12:37 PM.

Page 81 of 109 FirstFirst ... 31717879808182838491 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •