The images are correct. There's no point in nitpicking over it, they did some analyzing at B3D and there's nothing up with either on the benchmark
Yep, they made a chip that's bigger than what TSMC is physically capable of![]()
900MHz memory can't be right.
memory only 900MHz ???,
the screen shot looks legit
2x Asus P8Z68-V PRO Bios 0501
i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz 1.325v / i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz 1.300v
2x G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB DDR3 1600
Plextor M5P 256GB SSD / Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD
Seasonic X-1050 PSU / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold PSU
EVGA GTX 690 (+135%/+100MHz/+200MHz/75%) / EVGA GTX 680 SC Signature+ (+130%/+80MHz/+200MHz/70%)
Well, if the GTX 470 is indeed 800 MHz GDDR5, then 900MHz from the 480 isn't out of the realm of possibility
Strange to see that a 256-bit 5870 might have matching bandwidth capability
Wrong word, it's real!![]()
The final clocks are not out yet, im sure the memory will be at 1100mhz minimum.
Lol @ release date. Wow it even has the DAY of release![]()
ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"
That's OK. The BIOS version (gigabyte) and a lot more are not OK. Fake.
Actually it's the other way around. ATI currently caters to 99% of the market while the remaining percent will have 2 GB in a short while. The 4XX series are needlessly expensive to make.
Makes sense - it's most likely low voltage GDDR (ie. like the one used in HD5970) to keep down TDP
Which part of the "specifications pdf" would be wrong if my claims are true?
NVIDIA claimed that GF100 has stellar tessellation performance, which might well be true. But they never claimed that tessallation wouldn't affect shader performance.
If you have info that disproves what I said, by all means do share it.
Not sure if posted already, but anyway.
http://hothardware.com/News/NVIDIA-L...d-Vision-Demo/
So it beats the HD5870 on heavy tessellation, but it's a tie on "normal" usage.
Would that mean that the real advantage of Nvidia will be on future DX11 games, and not on current DX9/10 games?
If the advantage is for future dx11 games, then thats not really an advantage for consumer usage. By the time there is any spectacular or even semi decent game (AvP is bad and runs poorly anyway) there will be MUCH better dx11 hardware out. What matters is current games, if gtx480 is the same as 5870, then whats the point for consumers? I want performance in current games not games in 2 years, if I did I'd buy a card in 2 years. If gtx480 does in fact more or less equal 5870, then theres no reason to buy any card from this generation as simply put its just not a big enough step up in performance on any level.
lol, my memory bandwith is better
![]()
This is specially true for me. My 295 is faster than a 5870 at all levels, and drivers apart, (because CCC is a real PITA), if the 480 doesn't beat my 295 by a considerable margin there's no reason for me to change video card to a 480.
I want a bit more of juice than the 295 can deliver and the logical step would be a 5970 in case the 480 fails to impress. Thing is... The software sucks to be real honest about CCC, when will ATI deliver simple stuff like game profiles, i've been asking for this forever
I need AA8x for Crysis, but then i want to force AA16x in older games. Some games i want them with Vsync, some others i have to disable it (video card fails to deliver constant 60+fps) and i want all of this to be automatic when i start the game like nVidia drivers do.
I really like the 5970, don't get me wrong, but i always feel that something's missing when i use my other PC with the 4870x2 in it, this keeps me away from ATI for now![]()
ASUS Sabertooth P67B3· nVidia GTX580 1536MB PhysX · Intel Core i7 2600K 4.5GHz · Corsair TX850W · Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
8GB GSKill Sniper PC3-16000 7-8-7 · OCZ Agility3 SSD 240GB + Intel 320 SSD 160GB + Samsung F3 2TB + WD 640AAKS 640GB · Corsair 650D · DELL U2711 27"
lol@you guys actually thinking gpu-z "measures" things. It has a database for its information. If it says 620mm2 and 512 shaders, this doesn't actually mean it has measured the chip's size or anything. It just displays what its makers put in it as information.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Bookmarks