Results 1 to 25 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    Man, I'm 80% sure that fermi will be 15% faster than 5870, so where does that leave us? That's not even one of the options in your certainty! You must be at least 80% wrong.
    Just take it logically...
    GTX 295 had 480SP(240*2) frecuencys 576/2000/1242(core/memory/shader) with some weaker bus 448 bytes DDR3. And it is better than 5870 with 20-25%. So what is so bad that GTX 480 will probably have frecuencys 600/1300(core/shaders)?/5000(1250 GDDR5) ,higher than GTX 295?
    512SP single ,GPU 384bytes GDDR5,GTX 480 will be 20%-30% faster than GTX 295 and so logicaly say 50% faster than 5870.
    Say the quote is right than GTX 480= GTX 295 or less 5% inferiour, just it will have DX 11. Is this seems logically for some people?
    Nivida to launch after more than a year a card =GTX 295?
    I wonder what's going to happen if Fermi gets released and really gets close to the 5970 and beat the s*it out of the 5870.
    I'm not saying it's going to happen, but if it does, I'd love to see some people eat their words
    You're right
    Last edited by xdan; 02-21-2010 at 12:07 PM.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •