MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 2723

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    It's awesome how people fail to see that the R600 design too was long, and the card ended up big, hot and disappointing; but AMD used nearly the exact same design in 3000s, 4000s and 5000s and all those cards kicked butt.
    Over-reaching uarch that is ahead of its time normally has that problem. Just look at the NV30; people lament about how a terrible GPU that was but forget that it was the basis of the NV40 and subsequent 7900 series that was wildly successful.

    What ATi appears to have understood is that the product itself isnt what draws sales; its the execution. Eventually the power/die issues with solve themselves in time. Just make damn sure you get to market first and make sure the features and rollout is executed flawlessly and for the love of god know your limits.

    Nvidia desperately needs to learn this lesson... It is one thing if you are a gov't agency like DARPA; sure unlimited funds and unlimited time? Go for it make your Fermi. Nvidia however appears to have forgotten they are in the buisness of making money not padding their company ego or solving world peace one tesla card at a time.

    Make a card the PEOPLE want; NOT what YOU want. Simple Buisness 101. ATi gets it; nVidia clearly doesnt.
    Last edited by Sentential; 02-18-2010 at 04:16 AM.
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •